tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post8610296810076435978..comments2024-03-25T02:53:26.373-04:00Comments on Women in Crime Ink: Drew Peterson: A View From Two PerspectivesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-52364975023743269722009-05-23T17:41:16.847-04:002009-05-23T17:41:16.847-04:00Great job Robin as always. Drew Peterson is a mons...Great job Robin as always. Drew Peterson is a monster as is scott. To you voice of sanity you sound insane to me.jaemi levinenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-61698227745732219122009-05-21T02:23:42.133-04:002009-05-21T02:23:42.133-04:00Clearly you didn't 'follow' the trial since you ar...Clearly you didn't 'follow' the trial since you are incapable of arguing any point of it.A Voice of Sanityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11285284153694191831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-28010322195456482232009-05-20T12:25:43.092-04:002009-05-20T12:25:43.092-04:00I followed the trial everyday and that is complete...I followed the trial everyday and that is complete BS.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18077640269354675089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-9150974384572866752009-05-20T11:01:14.233-04:002009-05-20T11:01:14.233-04:00From the testimony of the state's own witnesses, D...From the testimony of the state's own witnesses, Dr Galloway and Dr B Peterson amongst others. See the first 2 pages ("The Evidence" and "The prosecutor's case?") of http://another9912.googlepages.com/ for a summary (quick read).A Voice of Sanityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11285284153694191831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-30113987583296405322009-05-20T08:51:41.531-04:002009-05-20T08:51:41.531-04:00"The plain fact is that Laci Peterson lived well p..."The plain fact is that Laci Peterson lived well past Dec 24th and was killed sometime between Feb 20th and March 15th (both approximate). "<br /><br />Where did this information come from? I didn't follow the trial, I had enough of the whole media blitz by the time the trial started. Just curious where these facts came from.Cheryl Dubeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07545585531909841029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-50618229499185829672009-05-20T02:00:26.762-04:002009-05-20T02:00:26.762-04:00Levi said...A Voice of Sanity, do you have a crush...Levi said...<I>A Voice of Sanity, do you have a crush on Scott Peterson? Whatever the murder case, you always mention Peterson.</I> . .<br /><br />No, the original post claimed he was convicted by CE. He was not. I merely pointed out the error.<br /><br />Further, you are a perfect example of what is wrong with the legal system. Your comments are either completely wrong or idiotically irrelevant. No matter, for example. which movie he had selected as his favorite, by some inane and distorted 'reasoning' you would claim you could deduce guilt from his choice. And so it goes with each and every one of your silly points. <br /><br />The plain fact is that Laci Peterson lived well past Dec 24th and was killed sometime between Feb 20th and March 15th (both approximate). This eliminates him from any involvement. <br /><br />Why do you hate him so much? Why don't you hate, for example, Gilbert Cano? Do you only hate people when your TV set tells you to? Why?A Voice of Sanityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11285284153694191831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-39517247210034837592009-05-20T00:56:52.960-04:002009-05-20T00:56:52.960-04:00A Voice of Sanity, do you have a crush on Scott Pe...A Voice of Sanity, do you have a crush on Scott Peterson? Whatever the murder case, you always mention Peterson. <br /><br />The evidence against that dirt bag was solid. He told Amber Frey on the phone that his wife died. And a week later his wife died! <br /><br />He told his sister Ann Bird while his wife is missing, that his favorite movie was "The Shining." The Shining is a movie about a man that tries to kill his wife and child. Scott Peterson was suspected of killing your wife and child.<br /><br />A normal husband wouldn't be talking about a movie where a man tries to kill his wife and child, when his wife and child were MURDERED and he is suspected. <br /><br />Also, during the vigil's for his missing wife, he wasn't concerned in locating her, he was on the phone with that bimbo Amber Frey. He wasn't concerned about locating his wife, because he knew where the body was at, because he killed her. <br /><br />GPS that law enforcement put on his truck showed that he had driven past the location where he dumped the bodies many times.<br /><br />Let's also not forget how he died his hair blonde, took survival gear and headed SOUTH OF THE BORDER. <br /><br />The guy killed her... It is as clear as day.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18077640269354675089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-48135720710563581842009-05-19T18:16:37.678-04:002009-05-19T18:16:37.678-04:00There are many errors in your post. One of the mos...There are many errors in your post. One of the most egregious is the claim that that Scott Peterson was convicted <B>because</B> of circumstantial evidence. He was not. He was convicted <B>despite</B> the CE, <B>all</B> of which proved his innocence. He was convicted by public prejudice and hysterical media 'attention', resulting in pressures which made it impossible for him to receive a fair trial with an impartial jury, a result predicted by the judge in one of his lucid moments.<br /><br />Many of the items you reference in these cases actually prove innocence and not guilt. They prove it because they are not determinative of guilt. A man lying about an adulterous affair is not determinative of guilt because almost all men will do the same under these circumstances. When the prosecution has to rely on such nonsense it proves innocence because it show how weak their case is. After all, all murderers have, at some time, eaten mashed potatoes. If a prosecutor triumphs the fact that the accused has eaten mashed potatoes as proof of guilt that then is, in fact, not proof of guilt, but the reverse.A Voice of Sanityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11285284153694191831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-62811381158513746252009-05-19T15:44:00.000-04:002009-05-19T15:44:00.000-04:00Sometimes even the "smart" ones get caught. Howeve...Sometimes even the "smart" ones get caught. However, our prisons aren't filled with rocket scientists. <br /><br />I hope the truth will come out during trial. Thanks for your take on this, Robin.Jan Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08709096924012665773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-53421705037610799662009-05-19T15:27:00.000-04:002009-05-19T15:27:00.000-04:00Amen Robin Sax! Nobody could have said it better....Amen Robin Sax! Nobody could have said it better...would love to see you in the courtroom!LadySheilahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13583481931214418711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316617410436977874.post-68914301056909634092009-05-19T09:36:00.000-04:002009-05-19T09:36:00.000-04:00I would think that a trained law enforcement offic...I would think that a trained law enforcement officer would be more adept at getting away with murder. Then again, he wasn't exactly exemplary in his chosen profession either. There is an "art" to finessing a homicide crime scene to make it misleading. Brent Turvey has written extensivly on this topic. Peterson, if responsible for this woman's death, apparently also isn't well read.Burl Barerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00246104277722164642noreply@blogger.com