Friday, January 15, 2010

Cherish Lewis Should Go Free

by Robin Sax

On July 24 2009, Judge Frederick Crow of Scioto County, Ohio, ordered 22-year-old Cherish Lewis, mother of five-year-old Jaelyn Rice, to turn over her child to the girl's father. But Cherish refused. Why? Because Cherish had information from Children’s Services that her daughter had been physically and sexually abused. Children's Services named the father, Stephen Rice, as the alleged perpetrator. For six months, Judge Crow has held Ms. Lewis in contempt of court for not producing the child. To add insult to injury, this judge has ordered Cherish Lewis to remain in custody until she surrenders the girl.

Little Jaelyn is in hiding (not wanting to return to her abusive father). And Cherish, the protective mother? She remains in jail today for trying to keep her daughter safe and away from the abusive father.

Are you confused? So am I. The facts of this case are beyond outrageous:

Evidence of physical and sexual abuse of Jaelyn has been presented to the court in Ohio. Pictures taken by law enforcement immediately following visitation with the father, Rice, depict dozens of bruises, indicating abuse of Jaelyn at different times. Why has this evidence been ignored by the court!? A Children’s Services case worker testified that the father initially said he didn’t know how the little girl sustained the injuries. He later said that the bruises came from an accident the little girl had had while fishing on a pier.

On two occasions, Children’s Services has substantiated the physical and sexual abuse—naming the father as the alleged perpetrator. There is also extensive testimony from Ohio medical experts, Scioto County Children’s Services, a guardian ad litem, and law enforcement validating the abuse allegations.

The little girl disclosed sexual assaults in Oceanside, California, and also in Tampa, Florida, while visiting with her father. Why isn't the court looking into the allegations? Both agencies failed to investigate the allegations of abuse and Oceanside Police stated that the father is a “likeable guy” and has chosen to ignore medical reports and Scioto County Children’s Services substantiation of sexual abuse so no actual charges have been filed against the father. Both departments keep pointing their fingers at the other, not wanting to take the lead in an investigation. Therefore, the father, Stephen Rice, remains free while the mother, Cherish Lewis, is in jail.

Judge Crow has ignored evidence of abuse in two separate hearings and each time ordered Jaelyn back to the father, the alleged offender. Judge Crow then granted custody to the father in February 2008. WHAT!?

At one point during a court hearing, the judge turned it around and suggested that Lewis had a condition called Münchhausen Syndrome by Proxy—a type of child abuse in which an attention-seeking parent fabricates or causes symptoms of various medical conditions in the child. This claim was later negated by testimony of a professional clinical counselor who spent time with Lewis.

On April 10, 2009, Ohio's 4th District Court of Appeals overturned the order granting the father custody—which just sent the case back to Crow.

Judge Crow ignored pleas from the mother, Cherish Lewis, to reconsider the evidence of physical and sexual abuse and to hear new evidence of sexual abuse substantiated by Children’s Services, of which Judge Crow had not heard. Crow issued an order that Lewis was to return the child to the father that day. Judge Crow then held Ms. Lewis in contempt of court for not producing Jaelyn. He ordered that Cherish stay in jail until she relinquishes her child. Again, Cherish remains in jail today. Meanwhile, Jessica Lewis (caption photo), Cherish's 19-year-old little sister and Jaelyn's aunt, faces charges of interfering with Rice's custody.

According to court testimony, when a minor, Stephen Rice was alleged to have sexually abused a four-year-old child. He is now twenty-five years old. Rice served in the Marines for two years, but was discharged. He says it was for failing a drug test. Since getting out of the Marines three years ago, Rice has moved twelve times.

There are several other cases on record where Judge Crow has granted an abusive or unfit father custody of the children. What is wrong with this judge!?

Judge Crow clearly has an unfounded bias in this case. During court proceedings, he said Cherish is “overly protective of her child.” I would be "overly protective" too if a judge were ordering me to give over my child to an abuser (even, and especially, if he was the father). The judge accused Cherish of having Münchhausen Syndrome by Proxy (defined above) and/or Parental Alienation Syndrome, which is defined as false or unfounded accusations of abuse against a parent—usually the father. But many of the therapists who treated both Jaelyn and Cherish testified in the various hearings that Cherish did not act in a manner consistent with Münchhausen Syndrome by Proxy or Parental Alienation Syndrome.

Why is the judge villainizing the mother in this case and granting custody to an abuser? Lewis has tremendous evidence against Rice to substantiate that he is a sexual predator and also, clearly, has violent tendencies.

You might think that this is a one-in-a million case, where a judge grants an abusive parent custody. But you would be wrong. In a recent article by Kathleen Russell, "Child Abuse: When Family Courts Get it Wrong," Russell argues that many states too often award custody to the abusive parent. She says, according to one conservative estimate, that family courts order more than 58,000 children per year in the U.S. into unsupervised contact with physically or sexually abusive parents following divorce or separation. This is an unacceptable statistic!

Many groups, including Action Ohio, Bikers Against Child Abuse, NOW Ohio, PAVE Survivor Justice, The Justice League of Ohio, Kourts for Kids, and many individuals are rallying for Cherish Lewis. They have come together to demand Cherish be released and justice delivered for her and Jaelyn. The groups got together on the Ohio courthouse steps to protest her incarceration following the ruling in July 2009. Unfortunately, Cherish remains in jail today and was not reunited with her daughter for Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Year's, and missed her little boy’s first birthday. This is a true tragedy.

If you are outraged, voice your protest by visiting http://www.cherishourchildren.net/

If you would like to send a letter of support to Cherish herself, here is the address:

Ms. Cherish Lewis
c/o Scioto County Jail
1025 16 Street
Portsmouth, Ohio 45662

You can find more information about this case at the Web site above, which is dedicated to Cherish Lewis and her daughter—as well as all other abused children who remain helpless, endangered, and denied access to justice.

215 comments:

1 – 200 of 215   Newer›   Newest»
Leah said...

This is very odd. Usually the state and DCS are in agreement unless the accused parent is a prominent member of society. But if this judge has a pattern of poor & bias decisions someone ought to file an ethics complaint and at least get him to recuse the case and allow another judge to hear it.

Anonymous said...

This is a very muddied case, seems straight forward but is not. The mother claims the abuse but why was dad never charged with abuse? How can the judge allow claims of abuse into the case if dad was never charged? There is alot on the internet about these people fighting back and forth and frankly seems to me neither of them should have custody. Children are not bargining chips, but parents are constantly using thier children to hurt thier ex-spouses. Mom has put all this info out there but where is the PROOF. No more he said she said, how about facts. I do not believe for one second that the entire system would be a party to allow this child to be victimized and knowingly send her back. Would the police ignore the evidence of abuse? and DCS? and Medical staff? AND the Judge? Smells fishy to me.

TigressPen said...

I am totally with you on this one. After reading more on this case and Cherish's dilemma(in particular the appeals court decison and Scioto CO docket sheets) this week, I feel her pain in my heart. I, too, feel she needs to be freed.

shthar said...

She is guilty 'of contempt of judge'

This is an even more serious version of 'contempt of cop'

The system at this point cannot show any weakness.

I hope she got the kid out of the country.

Anonymous said...

This is all fake. They are only giving 1/5 of a five year court battle. The juge is NOT bias. CPS does NOT thnk Stephen is the culprit. Just yesterday Stephen Volentarily took a polygraph test in Tampa- 3 times in a row- as per Kathy Lee Harpers request. He passed with flying colors. He has been proven innocent in domestic court AND Juvenile court. Cherish is an unfit mother. All court records are open to public.
www.sciotocountycpcourt.org type in Lewis, Cherish
www.facebook.com... join Jaelyns facebook page for accurate information. Justice Leauge of Ohio, be prepared for THE BIGGEST SLANDER LAWSUIT OF YOUR LIFE. AND ANYOTHER WEBSITES POSTING INFOMATION LIKE THIS- We are coming after you. Do real research. CALL TPD. CALL CPS OHIO. LOOK AT THE RECORDS. IT DOESNT TAKE A GENIOUS TO FIGURE THIS OUT.

Anonymous said...

http://www.facebook.com/Missing.Jaelyn.Rice?ref=search&sid=100000502788485.791715893..1


Appeals court decision from first appeal. The have denied all recent appeals.

Anonymous said...

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:aQkllNCM_fcJ:www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/4/2009/2009-ohio-1823.pdf+cherish+lewis&hl=en&gl=us&sig=AHIEtbRwq7qPhqWWaTpif8J_L9Xrt6woIw

Anonymous said...

Okay. I have read the court dockets. Everything is very clear for me. If everybody read it that would be a great help. Cherish Lewis did nothing but tried to protect her child from a typical abusive parent. The Scioto County Common Pleas Court's resume about the case is very helpful to see: the father wanted "his" son when he thought and then tried to anything with her what he wanted. He has a mental disorder - it's so clear. And they punished the mother because she should have known not to date such a kind of person like Rice. This is the only fault.

Anonymous said...

Dear Anonymous 1,

It is not the entire system that has failed. Children's Services did their job. They investigated on two seperate occassions and substantiated both physical and sexual abuse of this little girl naming the father as the alleged perpetrator.

The facts ARE there. Most are filed in the trial and some of the facts are attached to an exhibit at the Supreme Court. CherishOurChildren.net will be posting the facts very soon.

Anonymous said...

The Lewis Family has done nothing involving this whole case except fabricate. It is alleged that the grandfather stole the atorney's files after the July hearing and returned them after keeping them for a weekend, thus being able to copy all. This is the same attorney they owe over $20,000.00 to.
Cherish was offered a release if she turned Jaelyn over to CPS for a period of 30 days, but SHE REFUSED. Why? Afraid the truth will finally come out???

Anonymous said...

TWO judges, numerous courts and an appeals court twice (which has at least 6 judges)-- and they are ALL biased?
Cherish has NEVER taken sole responsibility for Jaelyn. Her parents and grandparents and sister have raised her. She uses a relatives address, but didn't live there. Why? To get welfare.
Jaelyn has become a pawn to the Lewis family - it will be money lost if they don't have her (welfare, Social Security, etc.).
Cherish's most recent chid doesn't even know HIS real father.
The Lewis family has made a mockery of the law enforcement, CPS, and the judicial system. And they only got help from this organization from "doctored up" paperwork from the files.
They couldn't pay attorney fees with the numerous attorneys they have used from Day 1, so they found an organization to pay the fees for them - another abuse of the system when this money could be used for someone with a LEGITIMATE CASE.
All this results to another big case - SLANDER.

Anonymous said...

Don't feel sorry for Cherish missing all those holidays and her other baby. She KNEW before she walked in that courtroom that she was hiding Jaelyn. She didn't even know what the judges decision was going to be - she already had her in a hiding place.

Don't feel sorry for any of them until you know the whole story - and the TRUTH. (Too much documentation to show all the contempts of Cherish not returning Jaelyn, making phone calls to the other parent at all hours of the day and night, taking Jaelyn around a REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER (she was seen with him driving his vehicle and in a public place - with Jaelyn - and he is older than Cherish's father).

Get ALL THE FACTS before you make your decision.

Anonymous said...

Couldnt agree more. This story by Robin Sax is bogus and not well researched. I got to same conclusion. Not to mention the entire community that knows Cherish is siding with the Father. CPS had at least 9 other UNFOUNDED accusations by Cherish. This is BULL that she's even taken it this far. I feel bad for both of her children. Jaelyn has now missed her first year of school and she will be a year behind. She is neglecting not one, but two children. CherishourChildren.net is ran by her family. It's a $10 site anyone can start, and slander. Her "RALLY" of organizations. ONE person from BACA showed up- family friend? And EVERYONE else was family members. TWO of the Cherish's fathers friends. Thats it a total of 12 people who showed up for this rally. Jaelyn's facebook page has over 2,000. I want to see the rally that says "BRING THIS BABY JUSTICE- BRING HER HOME". And in November she the appeals court ordered Cherish to turn Jaelyn over for 30 days to CPS... she didnt because CPS would give jaelyn right back to Stephen! They know he is NOT AN ABUSER. I dont know where you get your info, but you will look VERY FOOLISH in the months to come. I have lost all respect for your work ethic and you blogs.

Robin Sax said...

I wrote this article based on the court documents that I have personally reviewed. If there are other court documents (not polygraphs as those are not admissible in court) but police reports, DCFS reports, court documents, and the like, I welcome the opportunity to see them. In addition, the comments in this blog are my personal opinion as that is what blogs are all about. I do not know Mr. Rice or Cherish, never spoke to either one of them. I do not have an axe to grind. My only interest is to bring awareness to issues and to express my opinions about the need to protect children. Surely, you can appreciate that.

But, Anonymous (and Mommy I know who you are), threatening me on a blog and on my personal voicemail is not welcome. As I am sure your lawyer will tell you:
1. "truth", is an absolute defense to an action for defamation (which by the way is what you should be accusing me of and NOT slander as slander is the cause of action for ORAL statements).
2. "opinion"is another defense. If a person makes a statement of opinion as opposed to fact, the statement may not support a cause of action for defamation.
3.A defense similar to opinion is "fair comment on a matter of public interest".

But to address some other allegedly "anonymous" comments:

I have had numerous facebook people contact me and felt that they were "snowed" by who created the facebook site. They thought they were supporting Cherish only to find out they were sneakily on a site not created by her at all.


I know that various threats of lawsuits have been made not only to myself but to others who have blogged about this case Cherish. While these bullying methods and scare tactics may have worked for others it has greater meaning to me. Bullying and scare tactics are not the way to make progress. To me they are a form of abuse. From my experience, the defendants and suspects I dealt with 15 some years in the prosecutors office who were accused of child abuse, domestic violence and the like often resorted to bullying and scare tactics before they ultimately went to jail.

Anonymous said...

Ms. Sax, I am not the mommy on some of these anonymous posts, but I do know that the information provided is factual.

If you want to know the truth. Get the truth that is filed in court - not what the Lewis family has made available.

As for bullying tactics, the Lewis family could get a blue ribbon for it.

Everything that I have posted on this blog is truthful.

Thank you for the education on legal terminology.

Anonymous said...

First off let me say I don't know either party.
However, I have read ALL the court documents and know the truth of what happened.
The truth will set Jaelyn free.
Cherish is a monster, not a mother. She has defied court orders since day one. She is proving she is an unfit mother by staying in jail. How does she even know where her children are? She hasn't seen them for over 6 months. She is mentally ill, and needs to seek treatment. This is nothing more than being ignorant and spoiled to get her own way. All the things she has made up against the father have been proven false.
She is allowing members of her family to get a criminal record just because she thinks she is so special.
Now what kind of person would do that to a family member they are supposed to say they love.
A 19 year old sister now has a warrant for her arrest for custody interference in this case.
It will build to more people like her parents. They also will be arrested. For What?
Simply because she does not want to follow court orders.
All records can be obtained from the Scioto County Ohio Common Pleas Court. Go to this site and enter Lewis, Cherish. You will see. Also enter Lewis, Jessica. You will see she has an active warrant out for her arrest in this matter. It was issued by the court.
It's all there.
This site is just another pity party for her.
She is a liar. NOT ONE of her claims have been proven. NOT ONE
If your site is what you say it is you should be helping find this child and helping the law enforcement find the abductors. Help the real victim here, which is Jaelyn. She is a child not a dog.

Anonymous said...

http://www.sciotocountycpcourt.org/
Search this site for:
Lewis, Cherish

Anonymous said...

I want to know if anyone knows anything about Mr. Rice's history as a juvenile. I know what I have heard but have not personally reviewed documents about that. I can this: if he has a history of abuse of young children, the liklihood that this abuse occurred skyrockets. Also, just because courts "find" that there is daylight outside when it is nighttime, does not make the daylight a "fact." Abusers end up with custody of kids all the time. DCS's findings substantiating abuse and then the perp getting access to the child through custody proceedings would not surprise those of us who work in "the system." Protective parents are often persecuted and I believe that is what this case is about.

Anonymous said...

I can tell exactly which of these posts are from the "Rice camp" because the "mentally ill" tact was used in court and overturned by the court of appeals. Also, my understanding of the procedurally tangled mess of this case, is that mom has custody and believes that allowing visitation will cause her child to be abused once again. I believe some of the records will be posted on the web site cherishourchildren.net and I hope they are. As for Robin's comments about the bullying tactic used by abusers, AMEN

Cherry said...

I read this and I was greatly disturbed.

Think of what it says to anyone who has suffered from sexual abuse as a child. This child and needs help. Is there no one who may advocate for her?

I think Robin did a very good job of presenting the facts.

Please let's stop the abuse of our children.

Anonymous said...

MOM DOES NOT HAVE CUSTODY. She had visitation and refused to turn her back over.

IT IS CORRECT that this child is the victim - OF THE LEWIS FAMILY. She needs now and will need in the future some type of help in order to lead a half way normal life. Her mother has kept her in the courts since she was born!!!!!

The mother needs help herself. Been interviewed? That's funny. She knows how to play the victim. I just wish the organization that is helping her and you to Ms. Sax would see through all this.

Maybe one day you will. I just hope little Jaelyn doesn't suffer more in the meantime. SHE NEEDS RETURNED NOW ---- Cherish had that chance and didn't. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why. She didn't want the TRUTH to come out. Otherwise, why is she still in jail?

Anonymous said...

I am a supporter of advocacy for Jaelyn and the release of her mother Cherish. While the supporter from the Rice family portray a picture of honest intentions, their actions and tactics show something ele.

I am also a victim of harrassment and bullying by the Rice camp who used Jaeyln's name and likeness on facebook to contact and berate me. I have never met any of the above: Jaeyln, Lewis, or Rice, I am simply a volunteer who supports victims rights. It is troubling when someone goes to the length of stalking strangers on facebook...to the point where I had to report them as abusive to facebook. Their intentions must be examined....Why is the Rice family trying to silence a stangers voice?

Anonymous said...

This is an absolute horrific situation for this child and mother. It has to end soon.

Unfortunately since it appears that an investigator has interferred with the case from the beginning and the judge refuses to acknowledge the evidence and testimony, and the Rice family is publicly distributing erroneous information about the case and about Lewis family it is time to post the facts.

In order to understand the true circumstances of any case you can not merely read a court order. You must read the court transcripts, review the evidence that was admitted in court, and review the evidence that was either not admitted or not presented.

I have personally reviewed the facts of this case; the medical reports, SANE reports, the substantian from of sexual abuse from Children's Services naming Rice the alleged perpetrator. I have read ALL of the court transcripts which includes testimony from the sheriff's deputy who interviewed Jaelyn at the hospital. He testifies in court about the extent of the bruising, that it did no occur from a fall, the the bruising was darker in person than what is portrayed in the photos AND that the child had a swollen red vagina and abscess on her rectum. The guardian ad litem testifies that Jaelyn reported to her that she was sexually abuse, said it was her daddy, and demonstrated on a doll with two fingers how he rubbed her in a circular motion. The GAL testified that whenever you ask Jaelyn about her mommy Cherish she smiles and warms up and never has anything negative to say about her mommy. The

Stephen Rice had Jaelyn in Florida for several months. He returned her to Cherish Lewis on 11/2/07 at approx 2:00 pm on the courthouse steps. After seeing the bruising Cherish took her from the courthouse to the hospital. Jaelyn was registered at the hospital at 2:33 pm.

Jaelyn was a little over 3 years old at that time.
It is medically impossible for Cherish to have inflicted the injuries to Jaelyn, there was no time to convince a 3 year old to lie one person, yet remember to lie to numerous medical professionals at the hospital consistently in the matter of a few minutes that it took to receive the child at 2:00 on the courthouse steps, walk to the car, drive to the hospital, park, walk into the emergency room, and register.

There is no way the mother could have coaxed Jaelyn to do what is noted in the case file. The nurse notes behavior that she describes as concerning that has to do with how Jaelyn responded when the male doctor asked to see the bruising. What she describes in her report is not how a typical 3 year old child would respond.

There are also reports from several experts that Jaelyn required a variety of weekly therapies and treatments. Rice was ordered by the court to go to the sessions to learn how to properly care for Jaelyn especially as one of the therapies had to do with an eating disorder and that Jaelyn could easily choke. Rice refused to attend any therapies to learn how to care for his daughter and then refuesed to continue her therapies for several months at a time while in his care.

Even if you don't want to believe the child, the GAL, or other medical professionals that state that they believe the child...At the very least this would all be a case of extreme neglect.

Anonymous said...

Lets just pretend for one second.. (since you ARE NOT PYSCHIC, and you were NOT THERE) that both judges, two court systems, the appeals courts, and the lie detector were all wrong... (far fetched) Why then has Cherish not given the child to CPS when she had the chance? She wanted out of jail... they gave her the chance to hand the baby over... why not? The father has taken a polygraph... why wont Cherish? The problem with this kind of case is the person is always at a double standard. "Guilty until proven innocent" rather than "innocent until proven guilty". You say the judges were all wrong, the appeals court were all wrong..I bet if Stephens polygraph came up different, you'd be blasting it all over this as credible evidence. This is so one sided, and wrong. Have you ever though about the odds that Cherish is lying? What if you are condoning this behavior and Cherish is LYING? How are you going to feel knowing you helped endorse this abusive behavior and neglect? You will live with that the rest of your life.
If you want to prove to us... Put Cherish on lie detector test. Don't you want to know the truth? Who the real abuse is coming from?
We sure do.

Anonymous said...

The Court of Appeals overturned Judge Crows order granting custody citing that Judge Crow had abused his discretion on April 10, 2009.

The Juvenile Court did not hear all of the witnesses or the evidence. They decided res judicata on February 19, 2008, meaning the issue before the court has already been heard by another court.

However, the case had not been fully heard by another court. Judge Crow heard testimony from law enforcment (stating that the bruising was darker in person than what appeared in photos and was a result of human contact-not a fall-and also reported that Jaelyn had swollen red vagina and abscess on her rectum) and children's services (who by the way recommended supervised visiation until the criminal investigation was concluded) on January 4, 2008 and had the remainder of the hearing on February 20, 2008. On February 20, 2008 the Guardian Ad Litem testified that Jaelyn stated that she was sexually abused by Stephen Rice and then demonstrated how it was done on a doll. The Guardian Ad Litem further stated that she believed that Jaelyn was telling the truth. In additiona the Guardian Ad Litem said that when Jaelyn spoke of her mother Cherish she would smile and have nothing negative to say about her.

On February 20, 2008 Judge Crow also heard testimony from an expert the Cherish DID NOT have Munchausen or Parental Alienation Syndromes.

Judge Crow also refused to allow the medical records from the hospital to be entered as evidence.

Judge Crow refused to all the Licensed Clinical Therapist's report proving that Cherish did not have Munchausen or Parental Alienation Syndromes.

In the January 4, 2008 hearing Judge Crow did not allow the photos of the bruising to be admitted as evidence.

Sure, I thought about the fact that Cherish could be lying. I think about that possibility with all cases. That is why I thoroughly review every case that I am involved in. As they say in southern Ohio, I have no dog in this fight...we'll let me clarify...I had no dog in this fight until I thoroughly reviewed the facts of the case.

So yes...I believe that 2 judges are wrong...Juvenile Court Judge did not hear all witness statements and evidence and deferred to Judge Crow in Domestic Relations Court. Judge Crow has ignored testimony from several experts, ignored evidence, and ignored recommendations from Children's Services.

You're obviously lost when you talk about the Court of Appeals, they ruled in favor of Cherish and overturned Judge Crow citing that he had abused his discretion.

I'm not sure if you're Stephen's wife, mother, or friend, or if you are truly seeking the truth. If you are seeking the truth you should really take the time to go through the case file and read the court transcripts.

Anonymous said...

In addition you would like everyone to believe that the Juvenile Court Judge and the Domestic Relations Court Judge A) had both heard all evidence and testimony, when fact is the Juvenile didn't hear all evidence and testimony and judge crow ignored testimony and evidence.

Are you saying that a sheriff's deputy, children's serivces, multiple medical professionals, and the child are lying? All of which were present and had first contact and interview with Jaelyn on 11/2/07.

Anonymous said...

The beauty of this situation is the truth is already out. You have false documents possibly. Or maybe you just haven't done your research to learn anything she "substantiated" has been thrown out b/c it NEVER HAPPEND. She has inflicted abuse on her own child to blame it on her ex (which she still tried to get back with over and over) and keep in mind that is small town. She has crooked friends that work everywhere. So we can go back and forth here all day. The truth of the matter is... if there was ANY abuse inflicted on Jaelyn, it was done by Cherish. God, Jaelyn, Stephen, and his wife and even Cherish know the truth. Not to mention members of the family that all witnessed pictures being taken of Jaelyn before she was handed over EVERY TIME b/c EVERY TIME Jaelyn was given back there was NEW ALLEGATION! I don't konw what GAL testimony you have! You obviously need the testimony from 3 others. You didnt answer the question... WHY DIDNT CHERISH HAND JAELYN OVER TO CPS?????
IF JAELYN IS BEING ABUSED, AND CPS THINKS ITS STEPHEN (LIE) WHY DIDNT SHE COMPLY? WHY HAS SHE NEVER COMPLIED? WHY DID THE ALLEGATIONS START WITH THE VERY FIRST VISIT (3 HOURS LONG OR SO) WHEN JAELYN WAS GIVEN BACK, CHERISH RUSHED HER TO THE HOSPITAL AND TRIED TO SAY JALEYN LOST HAlf HER BODY WEIGHT (IN A FEW HOURS) AND WAS DRUGGED????? This is was VERY first allegation. THEN she said there wasnt medicine give to her ... medicine she never gave the dad! These are just the first two in a matter of a week. CAN YOU IMAGINE A NEW CHARGE EVERY TIME U WANT TO SEE YOUR DAUGTHER OF A COURSE OF FOUR YEARS! YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT ANYTHING IN REGARDS TO THIS CASE. THE TRANSCIPRTS ARE SEALED. YOU WILL SEE WHEN THIS IS ALL OVER. Stephen already won. THIS IS HER LAST DITCH EFFORT TO CAUSE A LIVING HELL. She has dug her own grave and will never see Jaelyn after this

Anonymous said...

The offer to turn her child over to CPS was for 30 days only. After 30 days Judge Crow could send Jaelyn back to Rice.

Children's Services has substantiated sexual abuse naming Rice the alleged perp. That is done it doesn't get thrown out.

If you want to know what happened get copies of the court transcripts. They are public record!! A deputy testified that Stephen did not go back to retrieve Jaelyn's medication because he was going to a cookout.

Yes, it appears a sheriff's deputy is telling everyone that there was no bruising on Jaelyn when she saw her at the courthouse on 11/2/07, but testimony from another sheriff's deputy, children's services, medical records, sexual assault nurse examiner and physician all state otherwise. Everything I posted previously is in the transcript and is public record.

Anonymous said...

What 3 others should I get testimony from?

Anonymous said...

**see** testimony from

Anonymous said...

I wonder what the Rice camp has to say about whether Mr. Rice did, in fact, have a conviction for sexual assault of a child when he was a teenager?
Also, when Cherish was thrown in jail, wasn't see trying to get a new attorney because he had represented Mr. Rice on such a charge?

Anonymous said...

"I have had numerous facebook people contact me and felt that they were "snowed" by who created the facebook site. They thought they were supporting Cherish only to find out they were sneakily on a site not created by her at all."

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that it is the Rice family or Rice supporter(s) who created Jaelyn's Facebook page. If you read the posts created by the owner of the page, it is pretty evident and crystal clear that they are trying to FIND her and that she is MISSING. Now you mean to tell me these geniuses thought they were supporting Cherish's page?!? Come on, are you serious? Cherish is purposely and illegally hiding Jaelyn. Why would she or someone she knows create a Facebook page trying to have assistance in finding her? Are you people really this idiotic? Well ma'am, I can assure you that the individuals who felt "snowed" knew they were on the Rice's page for Jaelyn only to gather information and then they collaborated and contacted you afterwards. Also, wouldn't you find it interesting that Jaelyn's Facebook page is "Open to the Public" whereas, Cherish Lewis's Facebook page (created by her best friend Amber Cheatham) is "Closed off to the Public", I wonder what they have to hide (besides Jaelyn, illegally) I am a supporter for Jaelyn via the Rice family and I am on their Facebook page and many of my friends and family as well. None of us have ever been cyber bullied, harrassed or mislead by the sites created in her favor by the Rices or their supporters. The Lewis family and their suporters are getting pretty desperate these days it seems. Their lies can only go so far before they end up catching back up to them. Trust me, that day is rapidly approaching. I seriously wouldn't be surprised if Jaelyn's story is turned into a movie from all the corruption, breaking and entering, falsified court documents, brainwashing tactics on a innocent child, abuse in many forms, deceipt all at the hands of Cherish and the Lewis family (and then trying to pin all of those allegations and abuse fabrications on Stephen Rice) will be made into a movie. It is insanity at it's finest.

Anonymous said...

"I have had numerous facebook people contact me and felt that they were "snowed" by who created the facebook site. They thought they were supporting Cherish only to find out they were SNEAKILY on a site not created by her at all."

KEYWORD: Sneakily

Yes, they were being sneaky on Jaelyn's site created by Rice supporters. The Rice's have absolutely nothing to hide.

Please investigate all the evidence and documents, transcripts, etc. thoroughly before you post to a public website, forum, blog..etc., since when this nasty "boil" finally erupts, you all will feel shame for supporting the abuser all along. She has pulled the wool over many people's eyes. I ask that everyone have an open mind and research both sides of the case and not just one. There are far too many holes in this case that are being given by the Lewis's to the public. They are fabricating truths and distorting reality to make Cherish seem as if she is doing something heroic and noble for Jaelyn. She is the ABUSER along with her parents. Jaelyn is NOT SAFE with the Lewis's. There is absolutely no evidence of abuse at the hand's of Mr. Rice. The only documents of such slander are those in which were STOLEN from Cherish's former atty. J.B. Marshall's office (by her Corrections Officer father, Domar Lewis)in which the Lewis's doctored the original documents to their liking to portray Stephen in a horrific and false manner. The documents you read were fabricated and are incorrect. There are always two sides to every story. People hear Cherish's warped side of the story and automatically they side with her because WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD DO SUCH HORRENDOUS ACTS TO THEIR OWN CHILD AND PIN IT ON THE CHILD'S FATHER? Cherish Lewis would and has. Open your eyes people, not all mothers love their children. They give them up for adoption, they neglect them, they abuse them, they even murder them. Just because Cherish brought Jaelyn into this world, doesn't make her a good mother. Cherish has an ulterior motive and I can assure you it is not within the best interest of Jaelyn. Judge Crow is not biased and knows the antics of Cherish and family. He is wise to her game and she is incarcerated by her own doing for her own selfish reasons. This is all about revenge towards Stephen. This is what it all boils down to. Also, prior to her incarceration, Cherish Lewis and Jaelyn were sited in a vehicle belonging to Ralph Ash who is a registered sex offender. Cherish and Jaelyn were both in this man's car with him. Now, please tell me if this sounds like a situation you would subject your child to if you loved her? No one from the Lewis side will comment on this factual incident. All I'm asking is that everyone should hear both sides to the story before they make their decision on who to support. It's simple, if you want Jaelyn to live a healthy and happy life, support the Rice family. If you want her to live a life of abuse (of all types) and hopefully live through it (and then she may turn out just like Cherish and turn to a life of drugs and prostitution) then support the Lewis family.

Anonymous said...

How can you say there is no evidence of abuse by Stephen Rice. Children's Services investigated and substantiated sexual abuse naming Stephen Rice as the alleged perpetrator.

Anonymous said...

The child is what this is all about.....and this child has been abused...I see alot of propaganda on here and it doesn't take a rocket sceintist to figure out where it is coming from via a family member or family member supporters.
This child has been abused......lets focus on that..... At this time with all the accusations of corruption from either abuse of judge/courts powers or false documention.....one thing is apparent.....it is time to move this case to another county and focus on what it is about......the child!
I am for Jaelyn......and that is the only side that matters. This is being made into Rice vs Lewis or Lewis vs Rice when it should be Jaelyn vs Abuse.
So enough of the postings about which side to support...there is only one side to support....Jaelyn....and this child has been abused !

Big A

Anonymous said...

"How can you say there is no evidence of abuse by Stephen Rice. Children's Services investigated and substantiated sexual abuse naming Stephen Rice as the alleged perpetrator."

I can it pretty easily when it's a KNOWN FACT that Domar Lewis (Cherish's father) broke into J.B. Marshall's office and STOLE documents regarding this case and had them in his possession for the period of a weekend. Once he was threatened of theft he returned them. Well Domar had ample time to copy the files and doctor them to his liking and then made copies. One particualar document that was doctored was the one from Children Services. If you were privy to the sealed court documents regarding the REAL, original, undoctored Children Services you would see the discrepancies and outright LIES that Domar & Cherish have added.

So I ask you Cathy, could you please put your time and effort into helping Jaelyn escape from an abusive situation with the Lewis's rather than willingly trying to hand her over to the abusers so that she can be forced to succumb to more forms of abuse at the hands of the Lewis's and company (RALPH ASH, registered child sex offender)!

Anonymous said...

still slinging propaganda...........must be a smoking gun over there on that side


Big A

Anonymous said...

I'm with you Big A. It is just so entirely frustrating when lies are being posted all over the internet about Stephen Rice. It is about Jaelyn and abuse. No doubt about that. Thank you for keeping her best interest in mind.

Anonymous said...

Best intrest of the child is what B.a.c.a is about......thats Bikers Against Child Abuse if you didn't know...and thier actually was 3 of us at the rally...not one as posted above. Kind of funny ain't it......when they were watching one of us...we were watching them watch.

Big A

Anonymous said...

The "Free Cherish" rally? How would that be within the best interest of the child to free the woman that has neglected her? From reading court transcripts, it is evident that Cherish has had numerous attorneys drop her. I think that these people are educated enough to know that Cherish clearly isn't a fit parent. Hence the reason the father was granted custody. I'm sure there are documents that aren't available for public viewing that showcase more in depth evidence as to why the father should have custody and why the mother shouldn't. If you should rally anything, you should rally that Cherish stays in jail!

Anonymous said...

As I said I am for Jaelyn....the abused child...and I was at the rally to represent Jaelyn, to bring attention to all that the child has been abused.....you can think anything you want about documents that are unavailable.....I know the ones I have seen that are available show there was abuse...you cannot debate with me about this case or try to twist things around to fit your needs to support your side because it further shows where your heart really is.....and that is not for Jaelyn....the innocent one here, the one this is truely about....the one who has been abused.

Big A

Anonymous said...

Here is what I want to know: Did not J.B. Marshall represent Stephen Rice on a charge of rape of a child when he was a juvenile and was J.B. Marshall not then representing Cherish Lewis AGAINST Stephen Rice when the sexual abuse allegations came up? Are these not documented facts? Rice Camp: These are yes or no questions. Be advised, I too have reviewed pleadings and documents that are available to the public...

Anonymous said...

Here is what I want to know: Did not J.B. Marshall represent Stephen Rice on a charge of rape of a child when he was a juvenile and was J.B. Marshall not then representing Cherish Lewis AGAINST Stephen Rice when the sexual abuse allegations came up? Are these not documented facts? Rice Camp: These are yes or no questions. Be advised, I too have reviewed pleadings and documents that are available to the public...

Anonymous said...

Did not mean to post that twice. Anyway, I want to know how can anyone say that Cherish Lewis got a fair trial if she was represented by someone who represented the other party in a case INVOLVING THE SAME ISSUES: sexual abuse of a young child? Also, Munchhausen by proxy (with no proof) and PAS is nonsense and judges and other professionals who use it as it was used in this case (in a decision that was later overturned) to support an award of custody to an abusive parent are just plain mean, wrong and/or nuts.

Anonymous said...

05/21/07 DOM ORDER
JUDGMENT ENTRY: UPON MOTION OF STEVEN A RICE, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PROVISION CONTAINED IN THE MAY 16, 2007, JUDGMENT ENTRY, PARAGRAPH 3,PERTAINING TO OBSERVATION VISITATION BE VACATED AND SET ASIDE.
606/12 Here is proof a court order that shows you are being lied too. The father was suppose to be observed with the child before he took her to florida. The mother ran with the child for 3 days and this order came into play. FOOLS

Anonymous said...

"Because Cherish had information from Children’s Services that her daughter had been physically and sexually abused. Children's Services named the father, Stephen Rice, as the alleged perpetrator." - Robin Sax

Where's your proof Robin? Where are these CPS documents you speak of? Are you just going by Cherish's word? If so, that is really awful and poor judgement on your behalf.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone really dispute the fact that CPS substantiated the abuse of Jaelyn by her father? Being able to convince a family court judge to give you custody does not make you less of a perptrator. Did he not admit to the sexual assault of a 4 y/o child when he was a teenager? Threatening people who tell the truth is also an abuser tactic...

Anonymous said...

There's no convincing necessary. There is absolutely no "fact that CPS substantiated the abuse of Jaelyn by her father". Can you please please PLEASE expand your mind? Those CPS documents were STOLEN by the mother's father and altered, doctored, etc. are NOT what the courts have. Those are only what Cherish's family has. They are not the real original documents. Gosh you really are so close minded, it's really pathetic. No, he didn't admit to any type of sexual assault. If you claim he did, PROVE IT! Where in writing (his and not altered transcripts) does the father "admit" such allegations? Also, aren't juvenile records sealed? Stop dredging and digging for 'something' to grasp onto. You're desperation is sad. Also, whose threatening who? What are you on?

Anonymous said...

TO THE RICE GROUP: I know this question has been asked already but I don't see where it has been answered, was Stephen Rice accused of, convicted of or admitted to any sexual contact with another child when he was a juvenile?
I'm sorry if you have already answered this and I just missed it.

Anonymous said...

Is there not a letter of substantiation that was mailed to the father identifying him as the perptrator of abuse of Jaelyn? YES OR NO?

Women in Crime Ink said...

Opposing viewpoints are welcome and encouraged here—as long as they are on topic and expressed appropriately. Generally, this leads to interesting, lively discussion. However, all reader comments that contain vulgarity, malicious personal attacks, or deliberately misleading information will be deleted. Women in Crime Ink reserves the right to repost comments after redacting any offensive material. Thank you for reading Women in Crime Ink and for participating in the discussion.

Anonymous said...

Why is the question, that has been asked more than once on here, not being answered by the Rice group?
Again, has Stephen Rice been accused of, convicted of or admitted to any sexual contact with another child when he was a juvenile?
I have seen on several other web pages where others have asked this question and it gets ignored by the Rice group. The only answers I have seen come from Cherish supports. I want the truth from the Rice group.

Anonymous said...

They Substantiated ABUSE without even talking to the Father!!!!!!...If you know everything about the case then lets hear what happened at the Court of Appeals Oral Argument 2/12/10. Why has the Sheriffs office already sent a letter disputing what cherish's attorney is stating. Exact words Barwell said to the panel of judges that the Scioto County Sheriffs Office knows where she is. There is a HURRICANE COMING TAKE COVER BITCHES

Anonymous said...

Yea well answer this question LEWIS CAMP. Why was CHERISH seen with RALPH ASH a REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS WITH JAELYN IN THE CAR?

Anonymous said...

Aha! So we do admit substantiated abuse. Finally. What would the father have been expected to say if he were questioned? "Yes, I did molest my daughter and her disclosures of abuse are true so take me to jail?" Where was he when the investigation was going on? Moving from state to state? Why all the moves?

Anonymous said...

I was looking for a yes or no answer to the question of previous sex abuse allegations but it doesn't look like the Rice group is going to answer the question. They are just going to ignore the questions that make their client look bad. They want the "truth" to come out but not about their side. Again, I welcome the yes or no answer to the previous question about other charges or at least explain why you aren't answering the question.

Anonymous said...

Very good question. They say he didn't admit it but don't say he wasn't found guilty or "adjudicated" is I think the legal term for a juvenile. I think they really have answered the question. How could a mother want her child to be with someone with that kind of past-even if there was not so much evidence in THIS case...

Anonymous said...

If the mother was truly concerned that her daughter suffered any type of abuse by the father, then might I ask why she didn't claim such abuses until he was awarded custody? This case has been going on since '05 and I believe the father was given visitation rights in '07. Why now would the mother go to such lengths. It doesn't really add up. I'm thinking the mother is trying to cover up something from her end and not the father's. Another thing, I keep reading about a sex offender and/or child predator, Ralph Ash. It is stated on numerous forums (this included) that the mother was seen driving this man's car and that she had her daughter with her. In the same car as a sexual predator? That is pretty disgusting. Why isn't anyone touching this inquiry? Looks as if the "Lewis camp" doesn't want to answer that. Why would the judge on this case not prosecute the father or take the daughter and put her into foster care if the judge knew of this past incident? Seems as if the courts know more than what some are posting. I have to lean towards the Rices on this one.

Anonymous said...

the mother was trying to protect her child from the beginning. All transcripts and expert testimony reveal this.

Anonymous said...

Can you provide links, please?

Anonymous said...

no problem, coming soon upon the request of the Rice supporters.

Anonymous said...

So you're waiting for the Rice supporters to request the links that you're claiming? Alright, then even though I am neutral thus far, I'll fancy your request and pretend to be a "Rice Supporter". I personally like to see facts rather than fiction or heresay. If you're going to make such claims that aren't available in public records, then I ask that you provide links when making your claims.

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure what the 11:47 post was about, but I just noticed this site.
www.cherishourchildren.net. The documents took a long time to load, and I'm not even half way through reading them, but WOW. I don't know how long this has been live, but this has got to be the documentation people are talking about. It looks like a bunch of court documents and stuff. Pretty nasty things too.

Again, cherishourchildren.net, and there's a big graphic of Cherish and her daughter there, which leads to the documentation.

Catherine Harper Lee said...

Requested Documents.

Please go to www.CherishOurChildren.net to review the history of this case and view collected public documents. The only alteration of these documents is the redacting of the child's name and the name of another reported child victim of sexual abuse.

The Justice League stands behind the research and authenticity of these public records.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm, very interesting site. Looks as if you really put forth some effort. It must've taken an extenuate amount of time to gather such nonsense! So what if the father smoked a joint? That doesn't make him a child molester. These links to documents look like they were scanned. So how would us Cherish doubters believe that the scanned doc links aren't the child services docs that were messed with? Just because you make a statement on your site doesn't mean its factual. The site didn't make a believer out of me.

Anonymous said...

You are right, the fact that Mr. Rice smoked a joint doesn't make him a child molester but the fact that he has done it before does. It's funny because the one and only person I have not seen on EVERY website is Mr. Rice. I seen his wife on several but I can't find one posting of him saying "I didn't do it". I have not seen any news video or paper clippings of him pleading for the safe return of his daughter. If it were me daughter I would be wearing a flashing neon sign. Does he want her found or is it that his wife has some sick fantasy about being her mother? She keeps calling herself Jaelyn's "mother". NEWS FLASH....she already has one. One that has given her life to protect her. I know at 22-23 yrs old the last thing on my mind was sitting in a jail cell but if I thought one of my children were in danger you can bet your rosie white butt that's where I would be.

Catherine Harper Lee said...

Thank you. A great deal of effort has gone into researching and assisting with this case and we will continue to do so.

There is much more here than the father's history of substance abuse. Medical reports, reports from sexual assault nurse examiners and physicians, testimony from a Scioto County Sheriff's deputy, Children's Services social worker, and Guardian Ad Litem talking about the extent of the injuries this child had when she was returned to her mother on 11/2/07. Testimony from the guardian ad litem that the child reported sexual abuse naming the father and the guardian ad litem's testimony that she believes the child and the reasons why she believes the child.

Children's services substantiated sexual abuse and named the father as the alleged perpetrator.

Again, there is far more concern for this child's safety than the father's history of substance abuse. Although that too is a concern.

The documents are all public record. Anyone can obtain them from court files.

Anonymous said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous said...

You expect us to believe these documents when J.B.Marshall admits to having the file stole. Well just wait until he gets on the stand as well as maria hoover and ruth buckler. These documents on cherishourchildren.net have been altered and have been copied and scanned for the Lewis Family Benefit. The Justice League is a JOKE. and so are you cathy lee your a JOKE, Cherish has abused over half the bar in scioto county and the judges that why your dumbass that knows nothing about the case. Only other than what your being fed from the LEWIS family. YOUR SUCH A JOKE!!

Anonymous said...

EVEN THE SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE OF OHIO THOMAS J. MOYER IN HIS ENTRY SAID THE MS.LEWIS MISREPRESENTS THE RECORD WHEN SHE ASKED FOR JUDGE CROW TO BE REMOVED. IF THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS IN AGREEMENT WITH JUDGE CROW AND THE DECISIONS HE HAS MADE WHAT MAKES YOU THINK JUDGE CROW WILL CHANGE HIS MIND. HE HAS BEEN THE JUDGE ON THIS CASE FOR OVER 3 YEARS HE HAS SEEN ALL THE COURTROOM ANTICS AND OUTBURSTS BY THE LEWIS FAMILY. THIS WEBSITE IS SUCH A JOKE cherishourchildren.net. THE JUSTICE LEAGUE IS A JOKE, AND THIS WEBSITE IS A JOKE YOU WOMEN ARE EVEN LUCKY YOU HAVE RIGHTS.

Anonymous said...

Can I get an AMEN from the last two entries? I couldn't agree with you more. To the cruel person who asked if the wife has some sick fantasy of being the child's mother, how is that a sick fantasy? A sick fantasy is staying in jail to portray oneself as a righteous person when in fact they aren't in the slightest. Are you implying that all stepmom's across the globe and all adoptive mother's are having sick fantasies when they want to raise a child? That is really a close minded statement. I commend the father and the new mom for staying strong and committed to Jaelyn and not losing focus. There are some extremely warped people in this world. Don't let them ever try to break you down. The system has faith in you and you have a strong support system. Justice will be served to the people that have Jaelyn and the people that have wronged her. Praying for Jaelyn's safe return and for the constant strength of the Rice family. Godspeed.

Anonymous said...

my butt is black.

Catherine Harper Lee said...

I'm very sorry if you don't believe that these documents are true court documents and not at all altered.

You will see at the next full trial court hearing that these documents are unaltered.

But rather than waiting until then, why don't you go to the Scioto County Clerk of Courts and pull the file, go to the Supreme Court and pull the letter from children's services substantiating abuse, and get copies of the transcripts from the court reporter, or if you are a close family member ask Rice to have Bennett fax you the transcripts. The transcripts of most interest are from May 07, January 4, 2008, February 20, 2008.

That is what I beleive anyone who is truly concerned about knowing the truth and getting justice for this child would do.

Catherine Harper Lee said...

To respond to a previous comment the Cherish Lewis claimed sexual abuse when the father obtained custody. That is not true. A quick review of the docket sheet will prove that.

Anonymous said...

Where is a statement from this lawyer that claims to have the files stolen? Is there a police report of the stolen files? Is there something substantiating that the files were indeed stolen or is it just another rumor?

Anonymous said...

Can the Rice people provide me with links to their evidence? I have read the cherish site. I keep hearing that the documents on there are false. I have also read the documents online through the court system, so if that's the link you are going to provide me with I have already seen it. It doesn't seem to mention anything about falsification of documents anywhere. If the documents on the cherish site are in fact false then why aren't charges being brought for that?

Anonymous said...

You will not find a police report since the documents were returned to JB Marshall once he threatened to prosecute. Cherish Lewis's father had the documents over the course of a weekend. I'm sure at the next hearing when these are presented, the opposing side will have the original documents to counter the false ones.

Anonymous said...

How did the father get these files? Why didn't the attorney press burglary charges or theft charges? I would think that as an attorney he would know what laws had been broken. If my personal practice was attacked like that I wouldn't just let it go. Why was the father never charged with anything?

Anonymous said...

Cherish's father did not have the file over the weekend. If you are going to comment you should only state what you know to be the truth.

Your "stolen file" theory is funny. You do realize that Marshall has a duty to turn over the file to Cherish. It would make no difference if Cherish's father had the file or not. As a matter of fact Marshall should have given the file Cherish's father. It is HER file, but Marshall did not give the family the file as he was required to do. This is a matter Marshall will likely have to deal with soon.

I hope you also realize that The Justice League is a reputable organization. They reaearch each case carefully and would never risk posting "altered" documents.

June Andrews said...

I'm June Andrews and not want to hide my name. I only wondering why Mr. Rice wants the custody so much? What's his aim? Has he a purpose with this little girl? I think if somebody reviews the court dockets and public court documetns it reveals that there's nothing what can prove Cherish is an unfit mother. So what is Mr. Rice's purpose?

TigressPen said...

June, I am with you.

Sadly, this post is only active with more anonymous posters who do not sign their comments with a name or allow their 'google' name to be shown than those with.

I also find it amazing that No documentation links have been shared proving the said documents used in the 'pro-Jaelyn' 'Pro-Cherish'comments are indeed falsified and/are severely redacted. Or showing proof otherwise that this sweet little girl wasn't abused. I pray she wasn't and all these abuse allegations are nothing more than hogwash. But, from what I've read, I feel it is a truth that she was abused.

I also do not see where Cherish is or was an unfit mother. I do, however, see her as a second victim.

Anonymous said...

The Rice camp keeps asking for evidence and when it's given to them they claim that the documents are false. I want to see the evidence that they have! They claimed on several different web sites that Cherish was in the car with a sex offender...where is their proof? All I keep reading is that she is sitting in jail because she's selfish or she doesn't want the truth to come out but that is hard pill to swallow for me. She has another child that she is missing out on. She is missing her young life that she should be living. For anyone to say that she is doing this for another other reason than to protect her child is ludacris.

Anonymous said...

I have reviewed the documents, see where the children (victims) names are redacted and see where there was another victim. I also see that the detective who was supposed to pick up the criminal case just sat on it and never pursued the criminal charges. I also know that Tampa is looking into it but it has been complicated by the procedural tangle of the custody court where a lot of smokescreens were obviously thrown up to overshadow the abuse (like it being done on this blog). I believe dad IS a perpetrator.

Anonymous said...

Shame on Judge Crow for trying to make this mother hand this child over to this guy. There are people sitting in prison with MUCH LESS evidence than there is in this case!

Anonymous said...

FYI-why would someone have to steal their own file? Files belong to the client. If an atty keeps a file from a client it is an ethical violation. So the stolen file nonsense is just that-nonsense. Also, the transcripts on the web site look very authentic to me...

Anonymous said...

So, why is it that Megan Rice feels the need to threaten anyone who talks out against Stephen with legal action? If there are documents online to support what people are saying why is she threatening people? I, for one, will be glad to bend over so she can get a good view of my butt when she kisses it.

Anonymous said...

The post previous to this one is the reason why nobody wants their names posted. I personally have been threatened with legal action by Megan Rice. She seems to throw that around a lot.

Anonymous said...

This is to the Anonymous person who wants their butt kissed and the Anonymous person who thinks Megan Rice throws legal action around a lot:

If you have been threatened by Mrs. Rice, it has been for one or more of the following reasons:

1.) You are the person(s) that have Jaelyn in their possession or you know the person(s) who have Jaelyn and are contributing to keeping her illegally away from her father and you admitted such information in a blog or post.

and/or

2.) You have created a case of Defamation of Character regarding Stephen Rice and/or Megan Rice (and any other Rice relatives).

Anyone who admittedly partakes in harboring Jaelyn is going against court orders and the law.

Mrs. Rice would not throw a threat out that couldn't be backed up in a court of law. So if you're guilty of such crimes, I'm sure it is then well deserved and I hope you get prosecuted for your actions.

You can read it for yourself in the court docket under the 8/11/09 entry.

http://www.sciotocountycpcourt.org/calendar/..%5Cnxhist.exe?casen=04PD000736

*Reference Date 8/11/09

I personally remain anonymous since a lumpsum of the people that are defending Miss Lewis are criminals (which is a known fact being as that they're breaking the law by hiding her) and we all can see what lengths they are going through to ruin the father's and step mother's lives. Not to mention they would try to spread malicious rumors about my family and I. NOT WORTH IT.

Catherine Harper Lee said...

This is Catherine Harper Lee of The Justice League. All documents posted are public record that were filed in court. We stand behind these documents.

Anonymous said...

How can Mrs. Rice or anyone else bring legal action against someone for stating what is in court documents? I have also noticed that whenever someone talks out against Mr. Rice they are accused of having Jaelyn or helping hide her in some way.

Also, to whomever is pretending to be a lawyer up there the legal definition of defamation of character is any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person. Having educated you on the definition I can now tell you that I believe any and all documents that show Mr. Rice sexually abused Jaelyn. If is "character" or reputation has been hurt it is by his own fault.

Anonymous said...

Did you personally pull those files yourself Mrs. "Cathy Harper Lee of The Injustice League" seeing as that there are no links to court websites. Did you obtain those records from a credible source (and I don't mean Cherish or her relatives or their crooked cop friends)? I can type up just about anything and make it look official and scan it to a blog as well. The only factual document on that joke of a website you created is the one where Stephen Rice tested positive for marijauna. Let's do a drug test on your client. A hair test would be preferable so that we can get to the "root" of this issue. Her drug usage will have you second guessing her credibility. Who cares if Stephen smoked pot when he was younger? I don't know of many who haven't. Now if he was abusing currently or more importantly, when his daughter was in his care, then that would be an issue. Cherish is known about town as a drug addict. It's amazing the amount of wool that is over your eyes.

Now Cathy (aka "Registered Documents" on Topix) that you're not hiding behind a screen name, please answer the following for everyone in regards to your innocent angel of a client:

- WHY WON'T CHERISH TAKE A POLYGRAPH (or 3)

- INQUIRE WHY SHE WAS WITNESSED WITH A REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER *RALPH ASH* WHO FANCIES YOUNG GIRLS, WITH JAELYN IN THE SAME CAR!?!?!

- WHY DID IT TAKE 33 MINUTES FOR CHERISH TO GET JAELYN TO SOMC FROM THE COURTHOUSE? IT'S SAID EVEN IN AWFUL TRAFFIC IT WOULDN'T TAKE THAT AMOUNT OF TIME TO GET TO THE HOSPITAL FROM THE COURTHOUSE.

- WHY HAVE SO MANY ATTORNEYS DROPPED HER?

Also,I would LOVE it if you would:

- TEST CHERISH FOR DRUGS

Anonymous said...

Congratulations to using the net to look up "defimation of character". No pretending to be anything. It's an actual law that is being broken left and right by the people that know of Jaelyn's location and are repeating what they hear based on their small town mentality. No one has any proof of these allegations, not even Mrs. Cathy Harper Lee of the INJUSTICE League of OH. You people just sit and relax. You'll soon be exposed to the outrageous antics of Miss Lewis and your outlandinsh accusations based on absolutely nothing will leave you ashamed of supporting this ridiculous excuse of a 'mother'. Then you'll wish you never had permanent blogs and posts portraying Stephen Rice in such a bad light. THE TRUTH IS COMING!!! I'm sure all the money spent on countless court hearings, flights to OH for court hearings and your daughter being kidnapped to having the world prying into your personal life disecting it and making false accusations, websites dishonoring your reputation with bogus lies, complete strangers being duped into lies brought on by Cherish Lewis, threats from the Lewis's, having to deal with all of Cherish's stunts in the courtroom, etc. will be ALL WORTH it in the end when all people who supported Cherish Lewis and Cathy Harper Lee will be clued into what transpires at the next court hearing. I'd give absolutely anything to see the faces on all of you people when Cherish is transported to prison along with all of the other criminals involved. Can someone say PRICELESS? Almost like a Mastercard commercial. I think then you should have enough decency to come forward and apologize to the Rice's for your contribution in aiding to the cause behind trying to free this monster from jail and from trying to keep Jaelyn from those that TRULY love her and aren't using her for their own personal gain. Until then, keep posting your lies and believing in false documents or documents that were taken from a GAL with the Lewis's in the same room. Yes, because a scared child is really going to confess against her attackers while they're in the same room. GIVE ME A BREAK!

Anonymous said...

JUST FOR EVERYONE'S KNOWLEDGE THE COURTHOUSE IS 1.58 MILES FROM S.O.M.C.(SOUTHERN OHIO MEDICAL CENTER) WHERE THEY TOOK JAELYN. 1.58 MILES TIME IS 3 MINUTES. WHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG TO GET HER TO THE HOSPITAL IF SHE WAS ABUSED LIKE THEY SAY SHE WAS??????DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME.

Anonymous said...

This is what someone on topix said:

"Not Cathy Harper Lee nor people Cherish's family will answer these important questions. The reason the question is being asked why it took Cherish 33 minutes to go a distance of a little over a mile is extremely important if she's accusing the father of handing over the child in the condition stated. When Stephen dropped Jaelyn off at the airport there was a deputy present and if Jaelyn appeared to be beaten and raped, I'm sure the deputy would have noticed. I was with Jaelyn every time before the infamous hand off and I know this wasn't the case. Anyways, from a legal standpoint, if Stephen handed Jaelyn over with no signs of evident abuse and then Cherish sees such 'evident abuse' upon her reunion with Jaelyn then why or how did it take such a lengthy amount of time if she "rushed to the hospital from the courthouse". This isn't a large, traffic congested city (Not implying you think that). This is evidence that Jaelyn was returned to Cherish unharmed and during the course of time that elapsed between picking up Jaelyn from the courthouse to taking her to the hospital is when the abuse ocurred. It occured by Cherish and whomever else was with her (most likely Rita Lewis..hate to 'assume', however Jaelyn has told me horrific things about that woman)during that timeframe. Stephen and Megan are keen on Cherish's tactics. They always take pictures of Jaelyn prior to handing her over to Cherish."

Anonymous said...

Another topix post:

"HAHAHAHAHAHAH wrote:
JUST FOR EVERYONE'S KNOWLEDGE THE COURTHOUSE IS 1.58 MILES FROM S.O.M.C.(SOUTHERN OHIO MEDICAL CENTER) WHERE THEY TOOK JAELYN. 1.58 MILES TIME IS 3 MINUTES. WHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG TO GET HER TO THE HOSPITAL IF SHE WAS ABUSED LIKE THEY SAY SHE WAS??????DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME."

"Were they pushing the car? If so, that would make sense on the amount of time that was elapsed. Otherwise, I'm with you. 33 mintues folks. She could've driven back and forth from the courthouse to the hospital ELEVEN times in 33 minutes. Now if my child had signs of abuse that arose such an urgency in me, I'd probably make it to that hospital in 1 minute if I resided in Scioto county. I also would like to add that if Cathy is as smart as she thinks she is, why wouldn't she question the time that elapsed? Tisk tisk Cathy!"

Anonymous said...

Question: Was Stephen Rice found adjudicated as a juvenile offender for the rape of a young child when he was a teenager? Is this part of the documentation true or not? Is it not true that while representing Cherish, her lawyer was discovered to have represented Rice on this charge while he was a juvenile? The answer to these questions answers all the rest of the questions for me...

Anonymous said...

those questions have been ask over and over and they can not answer honestly cause it would sink the ship.......its tough to admit that you have a perp in the family......

Big A

Anonymous said...

From the crazy topix post, but it seems the tide might be finally changing:

Partial quote:
Anyway, so if people don't believe the evidence presented here, that's fine, but as a scientist, you should look for proof, so I'll make you an offer.

Go to the courthouse and request pages 24-29 of the court transcript regarding Deputy Craft's testimony. The hearing in question, according to cherishourchildren.net is on the 4th day of January, 2008. It's a public document, and is freely available to anyone upon request.

Have it posted on a website, or on googledocs or whatever, and show everyone that it's false. Otherwise, just saying it's false doesn't hold a lot of water. I could tell you that I can fly, but until you see it, it's just words.

The testimony in question is a law enforcement officer describing the bruising on the child as being old and faded when he met her at the hospital, and it's significant because it means the injuries happened while the child was in Rice's care. It's on the cherishourchildren.net website, third main section that begins "Judge Crow Disregards..." and is the third subheading there, marked "January 4, 2008: Sheriff's Deputy Testimony in Domestic Relations Court to Judge Crow Regarding the Allegations of Physical and Sexual Abuse...." and is listed as "Document RR"

If you refute that I'll never say another word, and I will believe that you are not attempting to return a child to her abuser.

If they are forging these documents, they must have a bunch of time on their hands, because the sheer amount of docs there is amazing, and took me forever just to get through.

But if they are forged, I will do whatever I can to help, but until then, I remain extremely skeptical, especially since I've already been threatened, I think.

Thanks for helping me try to understand this whole situation. It breaks my heart."

--> End

Amen to that.

Anonymous said...

"The testimony in question is a law enforcement officer describing the bruising on the child as being old and faded when he met her at the hospital, and it's significant because it means the injuries happened while the child was in Rice's care."

WOW....that kind of blows the 1.58 miles/ 33 minute mumbo jumbo...

Anonymous said...

how much common sense does it take to understand 33 minutes is not a long time? Its not like we are talking hours!!
lets see you havnt seen your child in months and when you see her um uh you say hi honey how was your trip i miss you etc etc.. sweetheart how did you get that bruise um who did it? etc etc ok sweetie lets get in the car we drive over park and because you just realized what kind of traumatic episode your daughter went through - you may be a good mom that doesnt freak and calmly takes your child in and signs her in etc etc.. again we're only talking minutes where is the rice clan? Did they go running scared and I hope that Megan understands if she is hiding this abuse she can be held accountable by law!

Anonymous said...

What was the name of the deputy that met them at the airport --- was his job to look at the childs body or was it for another purpose? or is that something a mom would do after suspecting abuse from the previous visitation.

June Andrews said...

I think there's a lot of fear around the Rice camp and it's obvious why. I don't understand what's Megan Rice's purpose. It's none of her business at all. But there are documents, not only linked ones from the court dockets what you always cited. I know that in the court dockets are a lot of them but not the all. As we know any court can be able to scan and share everything with the public via internet. Do you think that the court may put on the Internet a personal investigation report? But irrespectively of this, those documents which prove Mr. Rice's great behavior are exist. Despite of the fact that you don't like it.
If you want to know: I'm not hiding Jaelyn, never met Cherish and never took a poligraph.
But I do know Catherine Lee Harper and am also aware about the tactics of abusers, so I'm on Ms. Harper's and Cherish's side. If Cherish has to hide something - it's only Jaelyn.

Anonymous said...

I thought this was funny when I read it so I thought I would share it with you. If the person who wrote it is on this blog...KUDOS! I am going to start with what Megan said in response to a post and it will be followed by a post back to her.

MEGAN RICE:
This person must me a relative. Possibly the person holding Jaelyn getting scared?
Every professional knows the truth.
Someone who tries to accuse every 6 months or so and it gets thrown out in court over and over again, obviously has issues. You do realize that's why she doesn't have custody, right?
Have you thought about the mental abuse thats putting jay through?
She is LIAR and a manipulator. That's why she has the track record she does.
Don't worry, if a few weeks all the evidence will prob be in the news. You wont even have to look it up.
She tried to file ANOTHER time, the day right before court! Desperate wouldnt you say? Her allegations were from NOVEMBER.
hmmm... 8 months later?? needless to say, that was thrown out in 5 days.
You should take a gooood look at the situation. And think of Jaelyn. NOT just b/c your from the smallest small town in the world and you want to believe they are good people.
I will pray for you and I hope you see the light as every G.a.l. has, CPS, two judges, and two diff court systems, and 4 legal battles. Its called M.B.P.
The proof is there my friend.
P.S.
I dont know if you know their background.
F.Y.I. I am an edjucated, well rounded, good person from a good background. Stephen is an amazing parent. Im not a dumb woman. I run a 50 million dollar company almost by myself, I have great taste in men, and chose the most amazing father for my children.

Anonymous said...

happy2bme:
it's not that you came off rude, it's that you came off untruthful. I'm with RR on this one. Your credibility is EVERYTHING and you just blew it away.

This thread started off as a question,,, a reasonable question based on conflicting reports of whether this child is actually missing or just a victim of a vicious custody dispute with lies flying in all directions. Then a step-parent comes aboard and makes a reasonable argument that the child might be in danger from more than just the selfishness and self-centeredness of the adults in her life. I accepted that your posts contained exaggerations and one-sidedness but that the child was also honestly in danger in the hands of her reckless and negligent mother.

THEN -- although you have supposedly fought unfounded accusations against your husband for years, a single post from the opposition sets you off to the point where you claim to be "educated person" that "almost single handedly runs a $50 million business". And of course, your husband is God's gift to humanity.

GMAB. Here's what we know. Your husband chose this woman to have a intimate relationship with and to have his child, although according to your posts she only hangs around with "scummy" "drug users" and "drunks". Your husband has been accused in court documents of being dishonorably discharged from the military due to drug use (testing positive for marijuana). That charge has the ring of truth since it is hardly subjective and so easily checked out by the judge. We also know a little about your self-proclaimed "education' from your vocabulary, spelling, grammar, sentence structure, etc. We also know as fact (because we are adults) that the "running the $50 million business single-handedly" is an outright lie.

Now, your husband's prior bad judgment can be chalked up to youth and possibly forgiven based on his present attempts at being a good man and father. Your education has nothing to do with this thread; remember who brought it up (YOU). But an outright lie, that's another kettle of fish. Your credibility is everything if you want the public's help in retrieving this child. Lack of credibility is probably why there has been so little interest by the media, who have the ability to make this a national story. RR is right, the child has all the qualities that the media loves to grab onto yet it has not.

Do you want to clear up these problems with credibility? Up to you. There are lots of other missing kids, unfortunately. Jay needs you now more than ever.

ITA with everything you and RR said.

The poster lost me at "edjucated". EDUCATED would know that.

Anonymous said...

I thought I would share a post that Megan wrote to me in response to a post I did on another site.(I got myself kicked off that posting board because I was asking the tough questions that nobody wanted to answer)

Anyway, the post I did gave some background to the case. One of the pieces of information I offered was that Stephen had been acussed of sexually assulting another child about the same age as Jaylen. I didn't mention any name or who the person was because at that point I didn't know. However, Megan kindly offered that information is her response.
MEGAN:
You keep saying Stephen abused Torri (his little sister) when he was a teen. NOT TRUE! Torri his little sister is loved (now she in High School) and everyone knows good and well thats not true

Keep posting your lies to sooth your ego. You will be in jail with Cherish soon. She has lost her rights slowly. this is the last straw.

You can see the whole post here: http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=356696&page=6

You won't, of course, see my posts as they removed them all.

Anonymous said...

Ohhhh June Andrews and all of you other Lewis lovers are going to be in quite a state of shock when this is all said and done.

This blog site is such a JOKE!!!

Anonymous said...

The title of this site pegs Cherish rather fittingly for she is a woman and she is a criminal.

Anonymous said...

Well, I for one am still waiting to be "shocked". You Rice people have given us no evidence except your word and that isn't worth the dog poo on my shoes. The Lewis people have given links to evidence to prove their side. I think the Rice people might want to be the ones getting ready for the shock.

Anonymous said...

Keep waiting. It will come when you least expect it. Just because we ("Rice people") don't feel the need to provide links as evidence in a BLOG, that doesn't mean the evidence doesn't exist. There is this little system called the judicial system and there are people that work there known as judges. Now the judges are presented with all evidence and testimonies from both parties (unless of course the evidence magically appears from thin air after judgment has been made) by these people that make a load of money known as attorneys. The reason I'm breaking it down for you in baby steps is because - THIS IS A BLOG AND NOT A COURTROOM!!!! I know, I know, I know - you actually felt important for a moment in time on this blog asking, taunting and demanding for evidence since all you have been exposed to are the imaginary counterfeit tampered scanned documents that when compared to the original documents (in the courts' possession) will open your eyes. Besides the Cherish Our Children website - what real documentation and links do you people have? Anyone can make up a website like Cherish Our Children's one promoting Cherish Lewis. Again, this is not a trial - this is a blog of speculation, double-crossing, finger pointing, corruption, defamation, slander, assumptions and so on. A majority of the MISinformation on that joke of a website didn't make its way into court YET since it has been altered by the Lewis's and they don't want that to come out in court. Judge Crow never overlooked or refused to look at any information that Cherish has provided. He has seen all that has been presented and like most of us, he is keen on Cherish's crazy outlandish childish antics and thus has made his decision to grant sole custody to Stephen Rice. If something doesn't go according to her liking, she creates a new ridiculous obstacle to buy time, every time. So just a little refresher - 'Women In Crime Ink' is not a court of law and the Rice's aren't on trial - the LEWIS'S are for breaking the law (nothing unusual there) and not abiding by the courts ruling. Why do you think Stephen is trying (and has for many years) to get full custody - to have her (Jaelyn) last name legally changed - to pay out the sphincter for attorney fees and flights to hearings - child support - having his personal life dissected under a microscope by complete strangers - bring someone into this mess (his wife Megan) - etc. if he really had something to hide and if he truly didn't care about his daughter and wants to provide her the best life possible???? I often think if many other guys were in his shoes, and someone devised such a cockamamie rendition of the truth and pinned it on them how long they would be able to tolerate it before they would throw in the towel? The only person in need of dire approval, a blog of” jurors” or Sherlock Home wannabes is Cherish Lewis. Stephen Rice isn’t looking for approval people; he’s looking for his daughter!!!! If I were most of you, I’d hold off on the speculations and conclusions being drawn and the one sidedness until you hear the ACTUAL FACTUAL NON-ALTERED and UNDISPUTED EVIDENCE, EXPERT TESTIMONIES and EXPERT WITNESSES from the ENTIRE outcome of this overly drawn out circus of a former custody battle. There are so many scandalous individuals within the “Lewis People” (Cherish included) that are deeply involved in this case illegally and have been from the get go.

(cont.)

Anonymous said...

(cont.)

Members of the “Lewis People” have succumbed to criminal acts, corruption and illegal activities all for the sake of favors owed, threats made or blackmail that has been inflicted by Domar Lewis and/or Rita Lewis and/or Cherish Lewis only as a means to keep Jaelyn in this unfair, unsafe, unjustified, abusive and neglectful whirlwind of an existence. It is no longer a custody battle it is for the safe return of Jaelyn to her RIGHTFUL PARENTS. So either you’re on the right side of the law or the wrong side since this case is BLACK and WHITE with little room for gray areas. Just because the “Rice People”, aren’t scanning court documents or providing links does not mean that we are basing our proof (documentation/evidence/testimonies) and experiences on “our word” alone. The last time I checked I do recall this as a missing person’s case and a CHILD who has been ABDUCTED against her will. Do what is right and write Cherish in jail – and convince her to turn Jaelyn over to Child Services and allow them to be presented with this so called “evidence” so that they can place her accordingly. If she and Cathy are so hard pressed convinced without a shadow of a doubt that they have a solid clear cut case and feel as if Cherish needs to be vindicated, then why won’t she consider the option entrusted upon her back in August from Judge Crow?? 33 minutes ‘may’ be ample time to get your abused daughter rushed from the courthouse to the hospital (in your opinion), however 30 DAYS is an insufficient amount of time (in your opinion) to supply Children Services with your hard core evidence??? You poor misguided people, you amongst many have been subjected to the brainwashing tactics that Cherish has manipulated you with. So yes, you will be SHOCKED - ”WHEN?” you might ask, well I can’t pinpoint an exact timeframe because I am not in fine tune with my psychic abilities on this given subject HOWEVER, I can assure you that you shouldn’t have a life threatening shock since the “Rice People” have been forewarning you “Lewis People” all along. Until that time comes, I suspect the “Lewis People” will still be working laboriously and diligently to unearth, concoct, formulate more false, unsubstantiated and farfetched fabrications to string their supporters along until judgment day (the courts for now, not the afterlife) and to eradicate any mishaps on their behalf in the meantime. Then some of you may want to invest in some fishing boots because you won't believe all the "dog poo" you'll be (and have been) swimming in compliments of the "Lewis People"!!!

***Don’t say we didn’t warn you!!!***

Anonymous said...

Wow, for this being a "blog site" you sure did submit your testimony. You keep saying that you don't have to prove anything to us or show us any kind of evidence. My question to you then is...what are you doing here?? You want to "set the record straight" but how do you plan to do that without evidence?? I have asked several times about the accusation of another sexual assault or sexual misconduct charge with another child (later learned it was his own sister) about the same age as Jaelyn and you Rice people refuse to answer it. You skip over it like I hadn't even asked. All I want is a yes or no. I have seen in the court transcripts where there was evidence presented to support such.

Anonymous said...

I believe that the Rice supporters know there was a previous finding by a juv court regarding an act of incest in Stephen Rice's past. Like Big A said, its hard to admit you have married, raised, supported, etc. a sexual predator. They hide behing Judge Crow. However, judges "misjudge" perpetrators every day and endanger children in the process. Rice WAS found to be a perpetrator of sexual abuse of another young child when he was a teenager, correct??? I believe we know the answer about the "other offense." Tells us what is going on here, doesn't it??

Anonymous said...

FYI- threats make you look like you are protecting a perp.

Anonymous said...

THE EVIDENCE IS WITHIN THE COURTS WHERE IT BELONGS AND NOT ON THIS BLOG OR ANY OTHER

IF EVERYONE IS SO HELL BENT ON PROOF THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THE END OF MARCH SINCE THE R.F. HAS MADE IT PRETTY KNOW THAT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO EXPLOIT THE CHILD ANYMORE THAN SHE HAS ALREADY BEEN BY THE L.F. BY ADDING MORE PERSONAL GRAPHIC DETAILS OF ABUSE ABOUT HER LIFE ON BLOGS(IE DOCUMENTS-LINKS AND SUCH)

FYI - I'M NOT SURE WHO THREATENED WHO HERE BUT IF ANY THREATS WERE MADE THEN IT WAS FOR WHOMEVER KIDNAPPED THIS CHILD

I CANNOT ANSWER ANYTHING ABOUT A JUVI RECORD SINCE SINCE I AM NOT OF ANY RELATIONS TO THE RF.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone really believe this crap? She just seems like another vindictive mother that didnt get along with her babies daddy, so now she is doing what she can to torture him and his family. Maybe she is the one that is the unfit parent? Did anyone consider that? Maybe the Judge hit the nail right on the head. Everyone on here seems so concerned about what Mr. Rice and his previous actions, why hasn't the child been turned over to the proper authorities and let them do their jobs and decide who the fit parent is? Even though it seems they have already come to that conclusion. The longer you keep her away, the more guilty you look. And that definately doesnt make your case for you or seem like a fit enough parent to even handle the responsibilites of caring for and providing the basic necessities of life for this child. In my opinion you are GUILTY and you dont deserve to have your child. Give her back to the people that want to love and care for her!

Anonymous said...

Would you turn your child over to someone that has been accused of and proven by medical reports to have sexually abused her? I doubt it!

Anonymous said...

Amen to the person who posted 3/1 @ 10:23PM!!!!!!She isn't a mother.She's a JOKE as is this entire thread just about.JOKE JOKE JOKE.You are all supporting a FRAUD!

Anonymous said...

Browsing through all the pictures posted on various websites of Jaelyn when in Cherish's "care" - I happened to notice the HUGE grin is usually accompanied with food (chicken nuggets to be exact). Is it just me or is does that look staged? I almost am thinking that Cherish bribed that smile out of Jaelyn with a HAPPY MEAL! SICK!

J: "I'm hungry."
C: "Oh really? Well, I'll give you these McDonald chicken mcnuggets if you smile really big in a picture!"
Picture Taker: "Jay, hold that nugget up so it gets in the shot."

Seriously, in one picture on Cherish Lewis's FaceBook page - Jaelyn is double fisted holding a mcnugget in each hand. Underneath it reads, "does this look like beef jerky?".

No - it looks like a child deprived of proper nutrution being treated like a dog who has to do tricks and jump through hoops for a treat. DISGUSTING!

Anonymous said...

How inappropriate and ridiculous to speculate on whether a child is being bribed with Chicken McNuggets to smile when there is overwhelming evidence that the child's father is a substantiated child sexual abuser of not one, but TWO children. Guess turning the focus on mom didn't wash with the Court of Appeals but the effort goes on. I think she is protecting her child and it sickens and saddens me that she has to go to this length...

Anonymous said...

I have seen pictures of Jaelyn with Cherish smiling and guess what?? I didn't see a chicken nugget anywhere! If all it takes to get someone to smile is a chicken nugget maybe I should invest in a bag for my 13 yr old son lol. That has got to be THE most asinine thing I have read on these posts yet lol.

Anonymous said...

I think it's more inappropriate to beat your child and try to pin it on the father; to bribe your child with food or otherwise starve them on a 'normal' basis; to lie to the masses in a piss poor effort to obtain a get out of jail free card. I also think it is a lot more inapproprite for people to speculate that the father's new wife had anything to do with this abuse. curious, were you hearing of a different court of appeals because the one i heard about did not go too well in favor of the mother. YES it sickens and saddens me that the mother had to do the disgusting things shes done and let occur to this child (along w/ her family) all for her benefit. very sad.

Anonymous said...

maybe your 13y/o son might be more interested in a playboy? or maybe some of the other party pics of cherish? nuggets may not do the trick lady.

Anonymous said...

"YES it sickens and saddens me that the mother had to do the disgusting things shes done and let occur to this child (along w/ her family) all for her benefit. very sad."

What about the things the mother of the father????think about the things she had to do to keep her son from being prosecuted.....

It saddens and sickens me that she did not do the right thing and have her son prosecuted and then maybe none of this would have happened

Anonymous said...

I'm sure my 13 yr old son would love to see a playboy just like every other 13 yr old boy. I'm sure it would make him smile....a lot but we are talking nuggets here lol. If that's all it takes to get someone to smile then I prefer the nuggets over the playboy. As far as the party pics of Cherish...so what??? What is your point? She was out having a good time. Almost every time I go out I take pics with my friends too. If that's a crime then I'm guilty lol. OH Mr. Officer come get me...I'm over here lol.

Anonymous said...

WOW................this is a LAME forum!
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
wake me up when something interesting happens.............like when Jaelyn is RESCUED and mama Cherish is hauled off to PRISON.

Anonymous said...

she has been RESCUED......she has not been returned to daddy PERP

what is truely LAME is the constant focus on anything and everthing other than documented abuse of this child

Anonymous said...

What is LAME is that she hasn't been RESCUED....on the run and in constant fear is not being "RESCUED". What is also LAME is all the people that fell for this NONSENSE.

For all we know YOU'RE the PERP!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Wow, let's see how many letters we can capitalize and how many exclamation points we can use because that's how we get our point across. I would agree that she hasn't been rescued but at least she's not being sexually assaulted.

Anonymous said...

NICE RUN ON SENTENCE! How exactly would you know whether or not she's being 'sexually assaulted' right now? Are you indicating that you know where she is and who she is with? How do you know exactly what type of company she is in and their backgrounds? Either you know this for a fact since you’re aware of where she is being hidden OR you’re basing your beliefs on assumptions (and we all know what ASSumptions make of us).

KEYWORD: "rescued". Do you know what that word means? I pulled the exact definition so that you can become aware of your implications and their hidden meanings:

Main Entry: res•cue
Pronunciation: \ˈres-(ˌ)kyü\
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): res•cued; res•cu•ing
Etymology: Middle English rescouen, rescuen, from Anglo-French rescure, from re- + escure to shake off, from Latin excutere, from ex- + quatere to shake
Date: 14th century
: to free from confinement, danger, or evil : save, deliver: as a : to take (as a prisoner) forcibly from custody b : to recover (as a prize) by force c : to deliver (as a place under siege) by armed force

— res•cu•able \-ə-bəl\ adjective

— rescue noun

— res•cu•er noun

synonyms rescue, deliver, redeem, ransom, reclaim, save mean to set free from confinement or danger. rescue implies freeing from imminent danger by prompt or vigorous action . deliver implies release usually of a person from confinement, temptation, slavery, or suffering . redeem implies releasing from bondage or penalties by giving what is demanded or necessary . ransom specifically applies to buying out of captivity . reclaim suggests a bringing back to a former state or condition of someone or something abandoned or debased . save may replace any of the foregoing terms; it may further imply a preserving or maintaining for usefulness or continued existence .

I'm glad we can agree that she is in a dangerous situation (which very well is an abusive one..no matter how you look at it) which comes to the simple conclusion that she needs to be 'rescued' from. PERIOD. I'm glad I was able to get my point across.

Anonymous said...

LOL You can only ASSume that you got your point across. Trust me...you didn't. Anyone can cut and paste from an online dictionary. My 3 yr old could do that so if your point was to show intelligent you are you failed. I'm quite sure that whoever she is around is far better than her father. I'm sure whoever has her isn't going to risk putting her back in the same situation she came from. They did, after all, take her because they were protecting her. Your accusation makes absolutely no sense. I suggest your spend more time correcting sentence structure than trying to make an intelligent argument.

Anonymous said...

Your 3 y/o is smarter than his mommy.

Anonymous said...

I hope this mess is straightened out soon so this child can be safe and a full, fair hearing can be held regarding the real issues of abuse in this case, which is child sexual abuse.

Anonymous said...

Yes, and at the hands of Cherish! Sick!

Anonymous said...

I see papers produced in evidence saying it was daddy perp! who just happens to have done it before and got away with it as a minor. Real sick! He will get his in prison!

Anonymous said...

I see papers produced in evidence saying it was mommy perp! who just happens to have done it before and got away with it several times in the past. Real sick! She will get hers in prison!

Anonymous said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH THE FATHER NEVER WAS CHARGED WITH ANYTHING IN HIS PAST. AND THERE WAS NO ABUSE AT THE HANDS OF THE FATHER AND HIS WIFE. ATLEAST THATS WHAT J.B. MARSHALL TOLD THE NEWS REPORTER HE DIDNT EVEN BELIEVE HIS OWN CLIENT!@!

Anonymous said...

I would be very interested to see the news report? Could you please furnish a link to that?

Anonymous said...

THERE WAS NO NEWS REPORT THAT IS WHAT THE REPORTER STATED TO AN OFFICIAL IN THE CASE

Anonymous said...

Now is this the same J.B. Marshall alledgedly making this statement that represented Stephen Rice in a sex crime case as a juvenile? Seems like a conflict of intrest here.

Anonymous said...

Hey guess what....Cherish is now home! WooHoo! Now what do you have to say Rice Camp?? What happen to all that talk about how she wasn't getting out? Let me guess, now you are going to say that the appellate court was wrong lol?

Anonymous said...

:) Oh ya, like one out of 5 appeals were overturned? So a conflict of interest was all and the ones about daddy abusing her were thrown out! We all knew that already. No abuse by Daddy Rice or his camp goers. Keep holdin' onto that happiness 'cuz it isn't gonna last long! Take tons of pictures of her ugly mug while you can 'cuz the next picture is gonna be another MUG SHOT! hee hee LMFAO!!!!!

Anonymous said...

You can say anything but Cherish is free!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Anything but..you are correct because she isn't! hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahah and guess what? jaelyn is STILL missing! how 'bout dem apples!

Anonymous said...

ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT THERE IS SOME JUSTICE FINALLY!!!!!!!!! HOPE MORE IS COMING. JUDGE CROW NEEDS TO GO (HEY THAT HAS A GOOD RING TO IT).
I AM APPALLED AT THE ABJECT LACK OF MATURITY OF SOME OF THESE POSTS WHEN THE SUBJECT MATTER IS SO GRAVE: SAFETY OF AN ABUSED CHILD, JUSTICE FOR A MOTHER, DUE PROCESS, ETC ETC... HOW ABOUT A LITTLE RESPECT OR JUST PLAIN GROW UP!

Anonymous said...

You are clueless. There is absolutely no justice as for a perp being freed. Judge Crow isn't going anywhere for he is a remarkable judge. It is more 'grave' of a matter that Jaelyn is still missing. How do we even know if she is alive? As far as I'm concerned, I am more frightened for Jaelyn's safety (IF she is still alive) now that Cherish has been released. If she plans on taking Jaelyn and her baby on the run, that is also a 'grave' concern for the childrens' safety. Respect was lost a long time ago when this sad excuse for a mother hurt this child and in a pinch turned the blame on the father. It is only a matter of time before Cherish is back where she belongs. (Is that a mature enough statement for you?)

Anonymous said...

mature enough for me, however, how about some showing some evidence for the allegations that you are making against the mother. I have seen evidence against the father as well as court transcripts where Judge Crow chose to bypass documents for some odd reason. As for being on the run, what is moving to California, moving to Florida, moving here moving there all about. Sure does appear to be running from something or moving constantly to hinder an investigation. Maybe now that thier is some people watching this case, Judge Crow being as remarkable as you state will take into consideration all the evidence before rendering a decision

Anonymous said...

Last time I checked, a blog website isn't a courtroom. The evidence is where it needs to be and has been reviewed HENCE the reason custody was awarded to the father. Why should anyone need to prove anything to you? Are you the judge? Are you Greg Barwell? If not, nothing needs to be 'proven' to you or anyone else. So are you implying that moving is comparable to 'on the run'? If that is so, I guess all active military families should be locked up indefinitely for 'running' with their child(ren). I guess same should go for musicians and actors since a majority of them have children and constantly travel and move. Its not as if the father was moving state to state to state. Having family in both states is what constituted moving between CA & FL. Also, when Jaelyn was living with her father, she was enrolled in school, played with friends, visited family, interacted with her cousins, went to various theme parks, attended birthday parties and holiday gatherings and most importantly WASN'T HIDDEN and carted to various locations 'after hours' like she were stolen goods. You sicken me to compare KIDNAPPING to a father moving. I've worked in sales and I know people in sales. These people (including myself) have moved many times due to better opportunities arising. I guess you could say its our driving force. Also, in case you haven't noticed, our economy is suffering and people are being laid off left and right. Especially in SALES! His wife is in real estate, so chances are I'm sure they get nice incentive in properties. So take all of THAT INTO CONSIDERATION before rendering a despicable opinion. Judge Crow is brilliant. He knows Cherish and her antics. He along with many others can smell her B.S. a mile away. So I'm sure he isn't the least bit concerned about anyone watching him. He isn't about to have his career ruined over a raving lunatic such as Cherish N. Lewis. Now could you kindly go educate yourself on this entire case before formulating such ridiculous allegations? Thanks!

Anonymous said...

Woa... I too have seen the substantiation of the dad being a perp. He even talks about his juvenile case in the tape that is quoted in the court of appeals opinion VACATING this "remarkable" judge's opinion. He is a sorry excuse for a member of the judiciary and should be removed from office.

Anonymous said...

No one said the blog was a courtroom, however what happens in the courtroom is public information, unless it has been sealed as the fathers juvenile case has. I was not implying anything, but was stating suspicous activity which should throw up a red flag in any investigation. The only thing despicable is your attiude and tone when someone dissagrees with your opionion or the "brilliant" Judge Crow, and I can smell your B.S. many miles away. How much money did you and/or the Rice family contribute to Judge Crow?

Anonymous said...

Ignorance and injustice was not tolerated. Supporters of Cherish Lewis still stand united and victorious. The Appellate Court judges heard the FACTS, not opinions, and Cherish Lewis has been released! God Bless all of you for not waivering under the threats, stalking, and intimiations of the Rice Family while they used "red herrings" to distract you from the FACTS.

Anonymous said...

Lots of love to Cherish. She showed remarkable strength and courage! I hope that others can learn from her character. Anyone can be a follower but it takes a leader to stand up and make a difference. I look forward to the day when I can take her hand along with Jaelyn's and ensure that have a care-free day of family fun!!

Anonymous said...

OMG you ppl are DELUSIONAL! its quite frightening. even more creepy was the post prior to mine with the lady wants to skip into the sunset hand in hand with cherish and her kid! sounds like a hallmark moment to me. can i come equipped with a camera and an airline barf bag? all of you ppl are messed up in the head. i guess you all are in the cherish head trance. this is comical to say the least. a bunch of nobodys and babbeling idiots forming a clique to support a fraud. thanks for the continuous laughs! lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

cherishourclique.com

Anonymous said...

03/15/10 DOM ORDER
JUDGMENT ENTRY: IT IS THE ORDER OF THE COURT THAT DEFT, CHERISH LEWIS IS TO APPEAR ON 3/30/10 AT 11:00 AM BEFORE JUDGE FREDERICK W. CROW, III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DEFT IS TO APPEAR WITH THE MINOR CHILD, JAELYN AND WITH HER OWN COUNSEL. FAILURE TO APPEAR AS ORDERED MAY RESULT IN A WARRANT ISSUING TO THE SCIOTO CO SHERIFF'D DEPT FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE ARREST, FAILURE TO APPEAR IS A SEPARATE VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS AND MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL FINES AND OR JAIL SENTENCES. COSTS OF THIS ACTION WILL BE ASSESSED BY THE COURT AT THE HEARING ON 3/30/10.
LOOKS LIKE THE LEWIS CLAN IS LYING I feel for all the professionals who have been dooped into believing this woman who has been proven over and over again to be a liar! Looks like someone's in trouble.

Anonymous said...

03/15/10
ISSUANCE
NOTICE OF HEARING ISSUED WITH CERT COPY OF ORDER TO THE SCIOTO CO SHERIFF FOR SERVICE UPON CHERISH LEWIS.
LOOKS LIKE THE SHERIFFS ARE GOING TO SERVE HER. LOOKS LIKE SHE IS IN BIG TROUBLE.

Anonymous said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous said...

You Cherish haters are very ignorant with your scare tactics and outright lies. No where in the previous post did it say anything about skipping off in the sunset, that was added by a Cherish hater. No one is in trouble either, it is a summons for a court date. The ones that are DELUSIONAL are the ones who have protected daddy perp in the past and still trying to protect him now.

Anonymous said...

Boo! Real scary.....this court day had already been scheduled before Cherish"s release. If you check the docket you will see on 2/17/10 Stephen Rice filed a motion to be excused from the hearing which was granted on 2/23/10 as long as he is available by phone. So no one is in trouble.....the court date had already been set

Anonymous said...

Then Why does she have to have Jaelyn there? That must mean the father is getting her back!!

Anonymous said...

Is that what it means, then I would think the father or alleged perpetrator would want to be there for that, or is he afraid children services will show up and testify with him present in front of Judge Crow that sexual abuse claim was substainted naming him as the alledged perpatrator.

Anonymous said...

Which was unfounded in court twice. I think its pretty AMAZING that the father does not have to be there and will still get his daughter back. The courts know on numerous occasions has fell victim the the mother's games! NOT THIS TIME SHE WILL HAVE A NORMAL LIFE

Anonymous said...

"I look forward to the day when I can take her hand along with Jaelyn's and ensure that have a care-free day of family fun!!" a sarcastic spin on this gay statement. GAG! LOL

BOO! looks as if you need to read and research for a real thriller. this is pretrial conference goofball and it was set AFTER she was released. look at the dates 3/12 and 3/15 brainiac! LOL

the father isn't scared of anything other than cherish's nasty face. nothing is going to magically appear before the judge that hasn't in the past. i hope that children svcs. does show so that the GAL (ruth) who has evidence and tapes of jaelyn naming the lewis's as her abusers will be exposed. i hope he is there too so that he can get a good laugh when all of these losers are defeated. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

this is so highly amusing i can barely contain myself. you lewis lovers are so delusional and under the deepest form of mind control. like you're all under a deep spell of the cherish lewis mind control trance. LOL

all y'all rice haters are gonna feel like complete idiots soon, well you already are complete idiots, you're just not aware of it yet LOL LOL LOL hahaahhahahaha LOL LOL LOL hahahahaha

cherish is a perp cherish is a perp cherish is a perp cherish is a perp cherish is a perp and you all are co conspirators in helping a perp free.

Anonymous said...

keep on repeating it, click your heels twice and maybe you can make it so, in the land of oz anything is possible, just follow the yellow brick road

Anonymous said...

Amazing, a wish for Cherish and her daughter to have a nice family day of bonding...and I am labeled as a loser? Maybe the Rice delegate, should practice some restraint in their blah, blah, blah posts. Better yet go see a psychiatrist and work out your troubles there rather than ranting and raving here. I will pray for you. Thank you and have a wonderful day.

Anonymous said...

I think some medication is order too! Dear, if you want counseling I will be the first to donate to the cause. Very very willing to help sedate the confused lunatic that lurks here.

Anonymous said...

muaaahhh haaaa haaaaaa haaaaaa...>>>>LOSERS!!!!! sedate me?was that a threat?shall i phone a lawyer.lol lol lol

yes sayin you want to hold cherish's hand and jaelyn's hand at the same time is a bit gay lol

please pray yes pray pray pray pray i had a wonderful day and now im just reading your post so that makes my day even brighter now. lol lol

NO RESTRAINT>>>>>the child is the one being restrained by the lewis ppl. poor kid.


so i take it you have been to the land of oz a few times and since you reccomend it well then sign me up please. lol maybe ill find jaelyn there? lol lol

Anonymous said...

I agree with the post congratulating Cherish on standing strong and everyone who supported her for not bowing to threats and intimidation. I really liked the part of the opinion about how the court gave her conditions for an early release and she did not take it. They did not even blink about that, I believe because they are beginning to understand that she was represented by a clearly unethical lawyer who had defended dad when he apparently sexually assaulted his family member when he was a teen. I REALLY THINK THE TRUTH IS STARTING TO COME OUT!

Anonymous said...

THE TRUTH IS THAT THE LEWIS FAMILY AND ANYONE INVOLVED ARE LIARS. THATS WHY SHE WILL BE ORDERED TO HAND THE CHILD OVER ON 3/30. AND IF SHE IS NOT THERE SHE WILL BE ON AMERICAS MOST WANTED. I HOPE SHE DOES NOT SHOW FOR THE HEARING!!

Anonymous said...

Or the truth is daddy perp will not be there because they have in his own words proof that JB Marshall represented him against similar charges and he is afraid his secret is now out.

Anonymous said...

well..........DUH!
the daddy already knew that jbm was his prior lawyer and that is why he didn't want him to represent cherish because of the fact it would be a conflict of interest. this is old news. daddy shouldnt have needed to inform jbm of the obvious. proof is there that jbm knew and took the case anyways. imo cherish knew too and used it to her advantage. not surprising. funny how on these blogs you lewis lovers were sayin that the daddy was tyrin to keep that on the down low when in fact if he did want jbm to represent her then i ask you why did he call jbm to advise him that he represented him in the past and told him that he wanted to go by the rules and didn't want any lawsuits to come from it? hmmm,makes one wonder doesn't it? Leaving a message too is pretty smart so that he had concrete proof. so your point again is??????????????????????

Anonymous said...

The point is the Court of Appeals has spoken, found that Ms. Lewis did not have proper representation and was at a complete disadvantage at her trial. The conduct of this lawyer and the judge is reprehensible and they should both be thrown out of the legal profession. America's most wanted would not touch this with a 10 foot pole, unless it is to look for the perp/dad...

Anonymous said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THE LEWIS FAMILY IS SCREWED.

Anonymous said...

I want to say this with in all sincerity: whoever this person is writing with all the hahaha stuff and all of the caps (obviously the same person) is so mentally off balance that I genuinely hope she is not around this child. I hope someone can track down the IP address to see who this stuff is coming from because the messages are very disturbing.

Anonymous said...

"Leaving a message too is pretty smart so that he had concrete proof. so your point again is??????????????????????"

My point is he is admitting that he has a history of being charged with sexual crimes commited on family members.

Anonymous said...

I believe that, from reading the Court of Appeals opinion, the juvenile case was also a crime of incest, which is very significant. There also seems to be an unwaivering support by his mother, no matter what crimes he commits against children.

Anonymous said...

"BOO! looks as if you need to read and research for a real thriller. this is pretrial conference goofball and it was set AFTER she was released. look at the dates 3/12 and 3/15 brainiac"

I did research, and if you open your eyes you will see that she was already suppose to be in court that day.....so it was no earth moving news as some were trying to implicate as she is in trouble now. Your insults, capatalization of letters and childish rant does not change the fact that the father admittly has a case history of sex crimes with family members.




































































'

Anonymous said...

I want to say that I cannot be more pleased with the Court of Appeals opinion. I have never met a single member of either family but believe the Court documents speak for themselves.

Anonymous said...

whatevs
whose to say HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH is a female?
yall are all dumb
go do something worth while
go find this poor child

Anonymous said...

Find her and what? Give her to the perp while the whacko judge is still presiding over the case?

Anonymous said...

either that or keep her hidden and on the run with the real perp aka cherish. or just give her to children services since she'd be safer with them than her current situation.

Anonymous said...

I see no evidence of anyone being a "perp" except the father. Either he is unlucky or there is something to the fact that 2 small children disclosed molestation by him. Both were apparently relatives. So, he is very likely a perpetrator of incest with a least 2 small children, one of them being his own daughter.

Anonymous said...

sounds to me that the lewis camps been guzzlin down the same endless bottle of denial. keep on drinkin!

Anonymous said...

Well what do ya know? WE WON! Jae is back with her loving father and Megan! Seems like you people will need to find a new hobby or try to ruin someone elses lives. Denial, denial, denial! Jokes on you Lewis campers!

Anonymous said...

We won!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sorry lewis campers! well, not really!

Anonymous said...

Like I said, whacko judge + pedophile dad = injustice to mom, danger to child...

Anonymous said...

whacko 'mother' + whacko supporters + whacko advocates + smart judge + smart non pedo father playing his cards right = JUSTICE BABY! IN YOUR FACE LEWIS CLAN MEMBERS! All the proof is in Jaelyn's face in the picture taken today when she learned she gets to go home to her daddy and mommy! YAY! Sore sore losers you all are. Go cry to someone who gives a flip.

Anonymous said...

rut roh. did someones wittle feewings get huwt? wooks wike mommy chewish is cwying her widdle eyes out. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah. hahahahah

Anonymous said...

This is the sickest stuff I ever saw. The judge is a complete fool and disgrace.

Anonymous said...

Seems to me the only motive for the Rice family was to "win" Jaelyn back. Comments like "playing his cards right" that one of the Rice members no doubt blogged is indicative of a game they are playing, using lies, manipulations and whatever other tactics they can to win, instead of the truth...and clearly a sign of foul play and danger to me!

What goes around comes around. Karma is a bitch...watch out!

I pray Jaelyn is safely returned to her real mom soon!

Anonymous said...

karma is a bitch, so is cherish and so are you. karma bitched you all out. we did 'win'. what a bunch of sore losers! we won custody of a child who was abused by the bio mom's side. face it sister you are suppporting the dangerous ones. jaelyn is away from it now. thank the good lord above. talk about reading between the lines - i took playing cards right as following the rules of the courts. if anyone is manipulating anything then you should take a look in the mirror. your prayers will go unanswered. karma baby!

Anonymous said...

go judge crow go go go judge crow go go judge crow go. justice baby justice. justice baby justice. oh the sweet smell of justice. take a deep breath. can ya smell it? can ya dig it?

Anonymous said...

It is obvious that Jaelyn belongs with her mother. If my daughter's dad was accused of sexual abuse previously and stated that the same thing had happened to her in front of a police officer and a doctor confirmed what my daughter was saying it would be a cold day in hell before he ever got near her again. Isn't that what any good mother would do?

That's what I would expect my mother to do for me.

Another thing---- "Megan" will never be Jaelyn's mother. Being a child's real mother is irreversible. Cherish can never be replaced 100%!

Anonymous said...

Megan is Jaelyn's mother now anyway u slice it/cherish is a dead beat/nothing more than an egg donor or a breeding vessel/anyone can make a baby/kids are adopted daily and the adoptive parents call those kids their own/the adopted kids call their adopted parents 'mom' and 'dad'. does that make them irreversible?/out with the old and in with the new/she's already been replaced/cherish isn't a mother/she only spread her legs and popped out a baby to drop off on anyone that would watch her/face the facts that jaelyn loves megan and calls her mommy/cherish got you all fooled/you are some pretty naive folk!

Anonymous said...

http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/4/2010/2010-ohio-1077.pdf

This is the appeals court decision in full, I am sure that anyone reading this will know that they did not intend for judge crow to send the child back to the father. Judge Fred Crow has yet again abused his power and discretion.


Cherish has won 2 out of 2 appeals and after reading this will surely win the 3rd.

Anonymous said...

oh anne, you're nuts!

Anonymous said...

This blog certainly shows the IQ of members of the Rice clan and the depth of just how crude they can be.

When you line up the facts in determining the best interest of this poor little girl it certainly does not go in Stephen Rice's favor.

Stephen Rice has a list of egregious and criminal behavior.

The only thing that Judge Crow and Stephen Rice has ever tried to hold against Cherish Lewis is that she has done everything she can to protect her little girl.

Just wait Rice camp. EVERYTHING is going to come out about Stephen Rice!!!!!

In the meantime he best not lay a hand on that child and treat her like a princess.

Anonymous said...

By the way...more criminal behavior regarding Stephen Rice is coming out!!!

Not to mention proof of prior horrendous criminal acts against children!!!

Anonymous said...

It's interesting how Rice is trying to block access of medical records.

This case is about the best interest of this little girl.

YOU CAN'T BLOCK ACCESS. ALL RECORDS WILL BE OBTAINED!!!

THERE'S SO MUCH THAT HAS NOT BEEN PRESENTED BECAUSE OF AN ATTORNEY WHO REPRESENTED RICE ON PRIOR CRIMINAL CHARGES OF SEXUALLY ABUSING A DIFFERENT 4 YEAR OLD CHILD WHO HAD A CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND...DID NOT...PROTECT THIS CHILD.

IT'S COMING OUT NOW!!!

IF RICE HAD ANY SENSE HE WOULD GIVE UP THIS PATHETIC FIGHT AND GIVE THIS CHILD TO HER MOTHER. BUT INSTEAD HE SEEMS TO WANT TO TRY HIS HAND IN A SYSTEM OF WHICH A JUDGE HAS BEEN FOUND TO HAVE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION NOT ONCE...BUT TWICE...AND WITH A SHERIFF'S DEPUTY WHO DID NOT FORWARD THE CRIMINAL CASE TO THE PROPER JURISDICTION IN ORDER TO CONDUCT THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.

THIS CASE IS NO LONGER WITHIN THE CONFINES OF SCIOTO COUNTY AND THIS CHILD WILL BE PROTECTED AND WILL GET JUSTICE AND.

Anonymous said...

are you making up some fake police reports or are you paying kids with candy to lie on your behalf? or both? since that is the only way you will have any criminal records on Stephen Rice. I hope you're pinching your pennies since you're going to have a pretty large lawsuit in your hands for making up so many lies on this site and on others. we know who you are. we are investigating you. be prepared!

Anonymous said...

coo coo. coo coo. (AMD)

Anonymous said...

OMG this is flipping hilarious! Someone posted this on Topix and I couldn't of said it better myself! This is referencing "Advocate" of Columbas (who also goes by many aliases which are(and definitely NOT limited to) "Advocate", "Advocate 3", "AMD", "Concerned", "Justice for Jaelyn", "Lady Buckeye" etc):

"observer
Anchorage, AK
Reply »
|Report Abuse
|Judge it!
|#414
48 min ago Judged:

1
Advocate, for someone who likes to "stalk people all over the blog sites" and then says "they" are the one with no life, you sure seem to spend a lot of your waking hours on these forums. Of the 409 comments on here, I bet 1/3 are from you. You really need a new hobby, as I think this one is slowly driving you nuts. I can see you now, walking down the street mumbling to yourself, "childrens services substantiated it, childrens services substantiated it, childrens services substantiated it, childrens services substantiated it". So the girl has scum bags for PARENTS. Yeah, parents, both sides. She should be in foster care or adopted."

I don't agree that the father is a scumbag nor do I believe that the child should be in foster care or adopted. I do believe that there is a woman on Topix whom identity has been discovered and now she is blogging to herself and answering under a different screen name. Pretty scary that the Lewis family has a psychopath rooting for them. Many people see this person as mentally unstable. What is funny is that she is lashing out on other bloggers as being on Topix 24/7 when she is just about the only person posting in the mother's defense and answering herself. That just brightened my day and I had to share it with you other psychotic Lewis freaks.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 215   Newer› Newest»