Friday, November 14, 2008

KELLY SIEGLER AND SUSAN MURPHY-MILANO ON E! THS INVESTIGATES: "HUSBANDS WHO KILL"

Tonight at 9:00 EST, don't miss two WCI contributors on E! THS Investigates. Our Prosecutor-for-Hire Kelly Siegler and our Violence Expert Susan Murphy-Milano were both interviewed for the show. "Husbands Who Kill" explores cases of seemingly loving husbands driven to murder their wives. One was in fact a loving husband. Problem was, his wife loved another man. That case ended in murder-suicide.

As most of our readers know, Susan's father (the decorated Chicago Violent Crimes Detective who caught the "Chicago Rippers") shot her mother to death before turning his gun on himself. Susan, then 29, found her parents' bodies. Ever since that day, she has dedicated herself to saving the lives of endangered women in domestic violence situations. She is also an author.

Susan will be providing commentary throughout the hour on tonight's program, which focuses on four women slain by their husbands. The three men who only appeared to be loving husbands had been living lies. Two had misled family and friends into believing they were pursuing advanced degrees, one in medicine, the other an MBA from Harvard. The truth was that neither had graduated from college and both were running out of money and lies. One of the wives discovered the truth, but did not live to tell. The other man gave his "ailing" wife Gatorade spiked with antifreeze and went on to become a popular radio host. (WCI's Broadcaster Michele McPhee wrote about that case and others in "Why Are Smart Women Carried Away by Fakes?")

The third husband living a lie was David Temple, a Texas football star turned high-school coach. Temple ended up being prosecuted by Kelly Siegler for firing a shotgun into the back of his wife's head. Belinda Temple was eight months pregnant with their second child. (Siegler, right, grills Temple during the trial)

Two of tonight's cases involve husbands convicted of taking the lives of their wives and unborn children. Lately, any story about a pregnant wife murdered by her husband immediately draws a Laci Peterson comparison. The Temple case predated Laci's by a few years, but there are notable similarities. The tale is complete with an Amber Frey look-alike—a mistress with one key character difference: Scott Peterson's lover did not know she was dating a married man until he became a suspect in his wife's disappearance. When Frey realized that Peterson had been motivated to do away with his wife so he could be with Amber, she helped authorities bring him to justice. David Temple's love interest, Heather Scott, a teacher at the school where David coached, knew her lover was someone's husband and father. After David murdered his wife, Heather (above) married him and testified on his behalf.

Once the cold-case made it to trial, the courtroom heated up as Kelly Siegler clashed with renowned criminal defense attorney Dick DeGuerin, making the media's prediction of "fireworks" between the legal giants the only easily predictable aspect of the explosive trial.

DeGuerin maintains his client's innocence, pointing out that Temple was filmed by Home Depot surveillance cameras around the time of the murder. DeGuerin (pictured right of Temple upon conviction) accused Siegler of being so effective at her job that she'd done what defense attorney Richard "Racehorse" Haynes once said was inevitable: "She's convicted an innocent man."

The victim's family saw things differently. When Temple was finally convicted nearly nine years after the murder, Belinda's brother said he'd suspected David's involvement within ten minutes of learning of her death. Following sentencing, her father said, "People have told us, 'Get over it.' You can't get over your baby—especially in these types of circumstances. . . . Put a shotgun to my baby's head and blow her brains out. It just wasn't right. And I'm so glad justice has prevailed."

In tonight's program, Kelly's case is just one of several stories on husbands who kill. For a full hour on the Temple case, watch 48 Hours on December 6 for the show produced by WCI's Jenna Jackson. Next year, expect a book on the case from Kathryn Casey, who's working on Shattered: The David Temple Story.

For tonight, watch Susan and Kelly for what the producer of "Husbands Who Kill" promises to be a provocative hour of television. Click here to watch the trailer for this special THS Investigates: An in-depth examination of criminal behavior.

Friday, November 14
9:00 p.m. EST
E! Entertainment Television Network
THS Investigates
"Husbands Who Kill"


Thursday, November 13, 2008

One Cop Who Never Quit

by Kelly Siegler

We are all raised to believe that what we should strive for in this life is the knowledge that when we leave this earth, we do so having made this world a better place. Isn't that what we have always been told?

If leaving this world better off because you have lived means helping people when they believe that everyone else has failed them or forgotten about them . . . If it means teaching someone that doing the right thing means telling the truth when you would rather not get involved . . . If it means convincing people to speak up and speak out even when doing so might put their very lives at risk . . . If it means taking on the cause of those among us who oftentimes never get heard . . . then I know such a man.

His name is Johnny Bonds. He recently retired from a lifetime career in law enforcement. He spent the first part of his career working for the Houston Police Department eventually finding his way to the Homicide Division. He retired from the Harris County District Attorney's Office as an Investigator. He spent most of his life doing what few have done better, as a "murder cop."

Johnny worked on the high-profile cases often enough during his career. One of his most difficult cases is profiled in The Cop Who Wouldn't Quit , a book Rick Nelson wrote about Bonds. But this article is written to tell you about all of the not-so-high-profile deeds that Johnny Bonds did for so many years.

Because my friends and I were fortunate to work alongside Johnny Bonds for so long, we got to see him in action close-up. His ability to convince people who were reluctant or defiant witnesses to come clean and tell what they knew the truth to be was masterful. His easy-going approach to handling dangerous and tragic situations was a lesson that all rookies would be lucky to study. His innate perception at how best to approach people from all walks of life was impeccable. The number of investigations and unsolved cases he closed are too numerous to count.

In the world of homicide cops, Johnny would tell you that he was no different than any of the other guys he worked alongside. He had far much less machismo and ego than one might expect. He was first and always a team player more committed to getting the job done than to anything else. His ability to laugh and to make others laugh when all seemed so bleak and his ability to size up a situation will always be remembered.

Ah, Johnny Bonds, the families you have given justice, sometimes single-handedly. The grieving parents you have given some measure of solace. The innocents you have helped make safe from the evil visited upon them. The wrongs you have helped right. The good you have done in this at-times terrible world. May God's blessing be always upon you. For all you have done for all of us.

You have truly left our world a better place because you decided to become a cop.


Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Painting the Scene of the Crime

by Andrea Campbell

The FBI has a library of paint samples and the National Automotive Paint File contains more than 40,000 original paint finish samples. This tremendous stock of material enables examiners to identify the year, make and model of any car by comparing the physical characteristics and chemical composition of paint found at a crime scene with that of known specimens. The chemical constituents of paint can be analyzed via releasing gases and using gas chromatography. This technique creates characteristics for each layer and establishes points of comparison. Also the shape of a chip can be matched to an area where the chip is missing.

With x-ray fluorometry, by bombarding the metal elements in the paint with high-energy electrons, an inner orbital electron of the atom hit by the beam is displaced or knocked out. In order to stabilize, an outer orbital electron falls to fill the void. The atom emits an x-ray and the x-ray emitted is specific to the atom (and therefore the element) that it came from. This technique permits examination of the composition of the paint on an atomic level. The elemental composition of the fragment should match that of its place of origin—allowing the fragment to be linked back to the crime scene.

Although a few flakes of paint may not seem like much, in cases with hit-and-run injuries they can make all the difference.



A ten-year-old Los Angeles boy was killed by a hit-and-run driver. Examiners took the boy’s clothes into an airtight scraping room and carefully rubbed paint off with a metal spatula. Tiny paint chips fell off the boy’s pants, which had probably been pressed into the clothes by his blood and fluids. The gold metallic paint identified was used on three model cars by the same manufacturer. The lab quickly notified the Los Angeles police department that the killer would be driving one of these models.

Soon after, police discovered one of the boy’s neighbors drove a gold sports car with a recently replaced hood. The suspect claimed the body work was the result of a different traffic accident. To his dismay, the hood was recovered, and the examiners were not only able to match the paint chips but they also found fibers caught in the metal that matched the boy’s jacket. Faced with this evidence, the owner of the car confessed to the crime.


Basically, paint can provide key information in any crime whenever a car is a component. A bank robber team in San Diego made the mistake of bumping into a parked car in their attempt for a quick getaway. After the smudge was identified, the motor vehicle bureau helped by providing a list of everyone in that area who owned that particular model. The foreign paint found on the parked car led directly to the apprehension of the harried bank robbers.

In addition to the collections of paint samples, the FBI has standards against which to test typewriting samples, watermarks, plastics and polymers, duct tape, gemstones, cosmetics, and even lubricants like eighty-five types of petroleum jellies. Anything that can be used to build a bomb or aid in a crime is compared microscopically, microchemically, and instrumentally. All specimens have to be identified using two different scientific methods and following established protocols, before it can be used in court.

As forensic science advances with computers and increasingly more accurate means of detecting the component parts of small samples, trace evidence may soon play even more significant roles. As it is, the more trace evidence an investigator can collect at a crime scene, the better the chances of making a case.


Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Google This



by Robin Sax

As we here at WOMEN IN CRIME know, it’s not just the facts, ma’am. It’s about where to find the facts and sometimes where to find the fiction. Many of us are looking for specific information but get sidetracked by useless websites with shoddy information.

Gone are the days of going to the library, standing on a stepstool, flipping through the card catalog, and being limited to how many books you could check out based on how big your biceps were. Now, with a few simple key strokes, anybody who wants to know anything is just a few clicks away. If you don’t believe me, Just ask Jeeves.com.

We live in a brave new world of research. The World Wide Web has changed the landscape for information-gathering for everyone, from writers to lawyers to criminals.

“Googling” is now a verb. Need to know about a particular person? Google him. Need to know about an issue? Google it.Looking for an old friend? Try Myspace, Facebook, Reunion, or Classmates. Need a professional or just want to network? How about Linkedin? Want to stay connected to friends, keep track of birthdays and special events? Try Plaxo, Birthdayreminder, and don’t forget Naymz!

The Internet can augment almost anyone’s library resources by providing alternate copies of print materials, as well as information that can’t be found in print or electronic formats.

Here are some examples of the resources that are on the Internet that may be difficult to find in a library: census information, uniform and model acts; news; publishers' catalogs; worldwide library catalogs; tables of contents of journals; full texts of articles from electronic law and non-law journals; books (such as the classics); bookstores (Barrister Books [academic textbooks], Amazon, etc.); song lyrics; comic strips; tax forms; sports information (such as professional baseball and basketball players' salaries and other basketball information); travel information; legal documents (transcripts of hearings, reports, briefs, memoranda, complaints, indictments, oral arguments, etc.).

As the Internet expands and people get more creative, they need to find new ways to find information. I have outlined some of the new(er) and different places to find information online. If you haven’t seen or heard of any of these sites, you are depriving your clients, your victims, your society, your readers, and yourself of a whole new dimension of the great galaxy known as the World Wide Web.

And now for some research tidbits:

CIA: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html -- How could a crime writer ignore this site? No crime website is complete unless it has a link to the Central Intelligence Agency. We use its 2008 CIA World Factbook (updated frequently) as a source of information about the countries of the world. See also "Maps" below.

Copyscape: http://www.copyscape.com -- "Copyscape makes it easy to find copies of your content on the Web. Simply type in the address of your web page. Copyscape will find sites that have copied your content without permission, as well as those that have quoted you." Copyscape is a free service; premium services are also available.

Dogpile: http://www.dogpile.com -- "Dogpile puts the power of all the leading search engines--Google, Yahoo, MSN Live Search, and Ask.com--together in one search box to deliver the best combined results. The process is more efficient and yields specific results. Dogpile was named top consumer search engine by J.D. Power & Associates for 2007."

Fazzle: http://www.fazzle.com – Similar to Google, perhaps an up-and-comer.

Newspapers: http://www.newspapers.com -- Answers everybody’s question: "What in the world is going on?" You can literally search thousands of newspapers online, including the abroad.

Ice Rocket: http://www.icerocket.com/ - Want to search myspace, facebook, and all socializing websites at once? This site takes people and profile searching to a whole new level.

Justice Interrupted: http://www.justiceinterrupted.blogspot.com -- Your one-stop shop for victims' advocacy presented with the honest breath of fresh air. Stacy, Susan, and Robin host a weekly radio show, advocate for victims, educate the community, and help in the investigation of crime.

Perez Hilton: http://www.perezhilton. com - Advertised as “Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site,” it’s a place to get to get scoop, gossip, and rumors. No need to buy the National Enquirer here.

Radio locator: http://www.radio-locator.com/ -- "the most comprehensive radio station search engine on the internet. We have links to over 10,000 radio station web pages and over 2,500 audio streams from radio stations in the U.S. and around the world."

Rotten Tomatoes: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/ -- Need to know what’s shakin’ in THE “industry?” Though one of the busiest homepages in the biz, it's not as negative as it sounds.

Scared Monkeys: http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/ -- No spin, no b.s., just good people reporting on the most interesting and intriguing news.

Search Engine Watch: www.searchenginewatch.com -- Search Engine Watch covers it all: news, headlines, reviews, tools, blogs, forums, listings, ratings, stats, resources, newsletters, reports.

Snopes: http://www.snopes.com — “Send this email to ten people and Bill Gates will give you a brand new computer”; “Your car will blow up if you’re pumping gas while on a cell phone”; etc. We all get these emails everyday, but are they true or just fear-making? Only Snopes has the answers to these questions and other urban legends.

TMZ: http://www.tmz.com -- I give you permission to visit this site in the name of doing “research,” but we all know the real reason is to see if Angelina is pregnant or if Britney and Kevin are getting back together.

Wikipedia: http://www.wikipedia.com -- In their words, this is “the biggest multilingual free-content encyclopedia on the Internet. Over 7 million articles in over 200 languages, and still growing.”

Zillow: http://www.zillow.com -- Are you buying, selling, or simply snooping for house values? The market is changing and zillow keeps you in the know.

The sites I’ve mentioned are by no means flawless, but they are interesting, often informative places to find information and new ideas. Regardless of what you find, you must always evaluate the information. Some of the questions you should ask in assessing the site’s credibility and integrity are:

1) What is the source of the information?

Is the author known? On what authority does the author write -- what are his or her credentials? Who sponsors the website?

2) Is there author bias?

What is the intent or purpose of the website ? Is the motivation of the website profit? accurate news? propaganda? scholarly information? Does the material appear biased in any way, or is it fairly objective?

3) How reliable does the information appear to be within the website?

How does the material compare to related sources, such as published books or journal articles?

4) How up-to-date or time-sensitive is the information?

How current does the information appear to be? How often is the website updated?

5) What type of reviewing process exists on or about the site?

Are there professional reviews available for the website?

It’s no wonder that people turn to the Internet as a source of information. And why not? It’s a cheap alternative to the use of commercial databases. It is varied and plentiful, not to mention a lot quicker than a trip to the library, unless your research turns into a shopping jaunt.

Speaking of shopping, if you’re like me and thrive on new finds, great contacts, and amazing resources, visit http://robinsax.com/saxfactsweekly.html for Robin’s latest discovery. In the legal realm, “discovery” is part of the pre-trial litigation process when each side requests relevant information and documents from the other to "discover" pertinent facts.

I have made discovery my hobby. Whether you need to know how to scout for a nanny, where to buy the best holiday gifts, when there is a great sale, how to locate an affordable web designer, or find someone who can notarize your trust at three in the morning, I am your source.


Monday, November 10, 2008

It's An Outrage

by Lucy Puryear, M.D.

"Woman Who Cut Off Baby's Arms to be Released," Houston Chronicle, November 7, 2008. Dee Schlosser was arrested in Dallas, in November of 2004 for cutting off her daughter Maggie's arms, resulting in her death. In the aftermath of the Andrea Yates case in Texas, several women have been found not guilty by reason of insanity after killing their children. All of these women, including Schlosser, were psychotic at the time of the killings. Schlosser believed that by cutting off her daughter's arms she was making a more perfect offering to God. The police came to her home and found her soaked in blood humming along to a hymn.

Schlosser was sent to a state mental hospital where she received treatment and continued to be under the jurisdiction of the court. According to law, persons found NGRI (not guilty by reason of insanity) must remain in a state mental hospital indefinitely until it is determined by their psychiatrist that they are no longer a danger to themselves or others and can be maintained in outpatient treatment. Schlosser will be released into the community where she will be mandated to meet with a psychiatrist weekly. She will no longer be allowed to have contact with her other two children, and may not be in close proximity to any other children. It is unknown where she will live when released. She will remain under the jurisdiction of the court permanently and will be forced to return to the hospital if she again becomes dangerous.

Understandably the prosecutors of Collin County are unhappy with her release and wish the laws were different. Understandably the citizens of Dallas are unhappy that she may released into their community. Understandably there may be some renewed talk about having the laws changed. Maybe Dee Schlosser should have been committed to a state psychiatric facility for the rest of her life? It is an outrage that a mother who killed her children is free to walk the streets.

I am going to ask you to believe that Dee Schlosser should be released and be free to live what ever kind of life she is able to piece together for herself. She is no longer psychotic, she is on medication, she will be monitored by a psychiatrist to make sure that she remains well. So why should she remain in the hospital; just so our sensibilities are appeased? That's a waste of money. Her being in the hospital does not protect you or your children. Dee Schlosser has no intention of coming to your house to cut off the arms of your child.

Many of you would say she should be in jail, or even executed for what she did. That would solve the problem. She did something bad and she should be punished. Does it matter that her brain was malfunctioning? That the blood flow to certain areas of the brain were increased where they shouldn't have been and decreased to other parts? Was this happening to her because she chose to be crazy or decided that hearing voices and was a good idea?

Let me ask you to fantasize for a moment. What if you had a hundred and four degree fever and you became delirious. You were hearing someone walking into your room in the middle of the night and when you looked up you saw a masked man carrying a gun. You reached for your gun on the bedside table and shot. Only later when your illness was treated were you aware that you had shot your husband. Death penalty? Think that's not possible? Hallucinations happen all the time with high fevers and brain infections. Your brain is malfunctioning.

Let's speculate again. You are driving in your car and have a heart attack. You swerve off the road and plow into a group of people standing on the corner of the street. A mother and her young child are killed. Death penalty? Clearly you didn't do this on purpose. Your heart was malfunctioning and caused behavior that was out of your control. Let me go a little further. What if you knew you were at risk for heart disease but declined diet and exercise and didn't take your heart medication because you didn't like the side effects. Death penalty? Surely you knew you were at risk for a heart attack. In fact you doctor warned you on numerous occasions. The fact that you had a heart attack isn't all that surprising. Are you responsible for those deaths?

Mental illness is a brain disorder. The symptoms are behavioral, and often the symptoms are horrific. No one wishes to be mentally ill, anymore than someone asks to have diabetes or heart disease or meningitis. And untreated the symptoms of mental illness can be deadly, just like any other medical illness. Not just for yourself, but as I described above, for others. Why do we treat the mentally ill as criminals?

Dee Schlosser will never live a care free life. She must live with the knowledge and memory of killing her child. She will no longer be able to care for or have contact with her other children, and her marriage ended in divorce. What kind of life will she have? Can you imagine waking up every day to that horror? As a matter of fact, most mothers who have killed their children eventually end up killing themselves.

Let me let you in on a secret. Every single one of you reading this has a mental illness, has a family member with a mental illness, or knows someone who has one. And if you don't know someone who does that's simply because they don't talk about it. The stigma of mental illness is so great that we can't face admitting that we are all affected. This is not unlike epilepsy in earlier times. Until the cause of and treatment for epilepsy was discovered family members were hidden in asylums, attics, and weren't allowed to marry into good families. That is where mental illness is today.

Dee Schlosser deserves to be released if she is no longer suffering from her symptoms. She is medicated and no longer poses any danger to anyone. Don't worry, if you feel the need for her to be punished she already has been. She will continue to suffer every day of her life no matter where she is living. She needs our prayers. And we need to pray that some day we can find the cause of and a cure for mental illness so that no one kills their child because they're sick.


THE PASTOR'S WIFE

Announcing the release of THE PASTOR'S WIFE: The True Story of a Minister and the Shocking Death that Divided a Family by Diane Fanning.

Mary Winkler shot her husband in the back with a shotgun while he was sleeping. She then took her three little girls to the beach. But when the jury said "guilty," she only sixty-seven days of incarceration remained. How could this happen?

The jury was united on the verdict but many were shocked by the sentence, expecting Mary's time behind bars to be counted in years, not days.

Unlike many perpetrators, Mary was a compelling witness when she took the stand. She seemed child-like and helpless. Her lead defense attorney, Steve Farese is a skilled advocate who knew exactly how to pluck the heart strings of the jury. The prosecutor appealed to the panel's common sense but the pull of the emotions resonated much stronger in the deliberation room.


Throughout the trial, though, no one could point to anything Matthew Winkler did that made him deserve the death penalty inflicted on him by his wife.

Go behind the scenes of this provocative case and into a world of domineering men, obedient wives and unshakable faith with THE PASTOR'S WIFE, now everywhere paperback books are sold.


Sunday, November 9, 2008

"Prince Charming" - Part 2

Women in Crime Ink offers an exclusive look at the first chapter of Barbara Bentley's new book, A DANCE WITH THE DEVIL (Penguin). If you missed the initial installment, click here.

Also, make sure to read our guest contributor's "Survivor Story" post from Friday. To participate in a Q&A with the author, visit the Ink Well (see live chat window along right margin) on Monday at 8:00 p.m. EST.

CHAPTER ONE


Part 2

With everyone settled back in the living room, the conversation turned to family. I shared that I didn’t have any children from my first marriage but I did have three sisters and a brother, all younger than me. The two youngest sisters were still at home; the one closest to me (ten years younger) was married and lived in Washington and my brother who had recently been discharged from the Marines. I joked that my parents had two families. I was the first, and when I was old enough to be the live-in babysitter, the rest started popping out. We all laughed.

Ted and Debbie had grown children from their first marriages and they brought us up-to-date with the latest news of who was where and doing what. Then it was John’s turn. I had to try to not let my mouth fall open as he wove a fascinating story.

When John was a young officer he married Sara Brimstone against her father’s wishes, because she was from old money and John was not. Together they had had a girl, Sandy, and a boy, Sonny. When John returned early from a long deployment, he found Sara in bed with another man. They divorced. He fought for custody of the children and won. Whenever duty called John to the sea or sky his Grandmother Dannigan watched the children in Coconut Grove, Florida.

Then John met Cindy Shirrow, an airline stewardess. They married and had one daughter, Estelle Desiree. In less than a year Cindy was killed in an automobile accident. John was in Vietnam when it happened, and his grandmother took one more child under her wing.

John’s fourth child came into his family through his father, who had adopted Francesca, the daughter of a faithful servant. When John’s father died, John assumed the responsibility. It was the right thing to do, he said.

John saw to it that his children were well taken care of as they grew into adults. When he was home he lived with them in his house in Coconut Grove. When he was away, Grandmother Dannigan and her servants continued to care for them. John made sure they went to the best schools, and all appeared to be successful. Sandy was married and going to MIT, Sonny was at NASA’s astronaut school, Desiree was at Julliard and Francesca was at Florida International University and living with John’s Grandma Dannigan.

Just when we thought he was finished, John hung his head. “We’re not very close now. I guess I was away too much when they were growing up. I feel like the black sheep of the family.”

Something stirred inside me. I wanted to rush over and put my arms around him and tell him it was all right, he had done his best. But I had just met this charming man and that would have been too presumptuous. Instead I meekly said, “I’m so sorry.”

Later, at the dinner table, Debbie sat John opposite me. He immediately reached up, ripped at the Velcro, and removed the blue-foam neck brace, saying the doctor recommended he only wear it when his pain was excruciating. Hmmm. . . . Looks even better, I thought. Ted poured the wine and John lifted his glass.

“A toast,” John said. “Here’s to the breezes that blow women’s chemises past their kneeses.” Even I laughed at that.

I looked around at the beautifully, evenly-set table and realized I was fully lulled into the spirit of Debbie’s dinner party. The meal, as always, was exceptional. Wine was plentiful. John, throughout the meal, was completely captivating. He complimented Debbie’s culinary talents, offered lighthearted jokes, and filled the hours that passed with more of his fascinating stories. A real charmer, this one, I thought, who knows all the right moves.

As the evening wore on, I learned even more about him. Before coming to Vestico as a consultant he was with the Federal Contract Administration. The FDA and the CIA, he explained, used the service. He was sent on missions into sensitive areas where it was, as he put it, “best for U.S. government presence to remain unknown.”

Before the night was over, he told us he’d been born in Turrialba and that he spoke Spanish fluently, having first learned it as a child living with his mother’s family in Costa Rica. That was why, he explained, most of his missions took him to Central America.

I interjected that I was a genuine California girl and that I had lived my whole life in one county - from being born and raised in Pittsburg to settling in Concord during my first marriage to migrating to Antioch for affordable housing after my divorce, all within a twenty mile radius. “For a world traveler like you it must sound dead boring,” I said.

“I envy you,” John sighed. “As a child I moved around a lot because my Dad was in the Navy; then I enlisted and the rest is history.”

“My parents still live in Concord,” I added, as if that tacked on some allure to my story. “They moved to California in World War II when Dad’s unit was stationed at Camp Stoneman. The weather appealed to them, so they stayed after Dad was discharged.”

John added that was exactly why he had settled the Bay Area, and then he was off on another story. To me, this dinner guest of Debbie’s was a regular James Bond. As difficult as it was becoming for me to keep my eyelids from drooping, I wanted to hear every word of the story he was telling about a mission in Panama City.

He and another operative, he said, had rented adjoining offices. They were close to completing their mission of forcing a drug cartel out of Colombia. One day, after lunch, John was at his desk in his office when he heard his partner’s office door open. John expected to hear his partner’s footsteps, but instead, he heard the loud rattle of machine-gun fire. Instinctively, he hit the deck, scrambled under his desk, held his breath and waited. The office door opened, and a strange voice said something about “getting the other one next time.”

Minutes later John learned his partner had been killed instantly. That might just as easily have happened to John, I thought, realizing that in real life, this James Bond stuff was horrifyingly brutal. As though reading my thoughts, John looked directly at me when he said, “That’s when I realized I was getting too old for that line of work. It was time to call it quits.”

I sighed deeply. “And it’s definitely time for me to call it quits now,” I announced. “It’s nearly midnight.”

While Debbie and Ted waved to me from the porch, John escorted me to my car, surprising me with his rapt attention. After I was behind the wheel, he asked me to wait while he walked over to his own car. He returned with a paper bag.

“I wish I had something more to give you,” he said, “but this croissant is from a special bakery in San Francisco. I know you’ll like it.” He grinned. “A special pastry for a special gal.”

It was an odd, but interesting, gesture. I thanked him for the croissant and drove away. On the way home I reflected on the entertaining evening and my introduction to an articulate, witty, and amusing man who had impressive credentials and exciting stories, a man who went out of his way to focus his charm and attention on me. But also an older man, I reminded myself. Parked in my garage, I grabbed my purse and the paper bag. What was it about me, I wondered, that made this man decide I was “special”? Although I had certainly learned a great deal about him, what exactly had he learned about me?

Barbara Bentley is a victims' advocate in California, where she was directly responsible for the passage of Assembly Bill 16, which changed California divorce law. A member of STAND! Against Domestic Violence, she addresses women’s and victim’s rights organizations, and her story was featured on Lifetime’s "Final Justice." Find out more about Barbara and her book at http://www.adancewiththedevil.com/


Saturday, November 8, 2008

"Prince Charming" - Part 1

Women in Crime Ink offers an exclusive look at the first chapter of Barbara Bentley's new book, A DANCE WITH THE DEVIL (Penguin).

Yesterday, Barbara wrote a guest contributor piece for us. Today and tomorrow, WCI brings you the first chapter of her story, in two parts.

For a live chat with the author, meet us at the Ink Well (see sidebar of WCI) on Monday at 8:00 p.m. EST.


CHAPTER ONE

Part 1

“Thanks for coming," Debbie said, giving my arm an extra little squeeze of appreciation.

"Hey,” I said, “A promise is a promise.” She had called me earlier that day while I was at work, preoccupied with testing samples in my analytical lab at the Excelsior Chemical Company. When she’d asked me to round out the double date for a dinner party at her house that evening, she wouldn’t take no for an answer, so here I was.

I knew what Debbie was up to. Five months earlier, in February 1981, after I split up with a man who was a close friend of Debbie and her husband Ted, Debbie somehow saw me as her “perfect single woman” friend. Somehow she’d managed to extract a promise from me: that I would help her keep her dinner table evenly set.

The eternal optimist, I wasn’t opposed to meeting new men myself. When I asked about who my date for the night would be, she answered, “Older than you, but you don’t have to think of him as a date. The point is, I know you’ll find him interesting. His great-grandfather was Admiral Peary. Remember? Peary…North Pole? John works over at Vestico with Ted. You’ll like him.”

I wasn’t holding my breath that we’d be a love match, and I was exhausted from working long shifts, but Debbie had a way of talking me into social events, and so I found myself agreeing. Besides, what harm could it cause? It was only dinner.

By the time I’d arrived and she’d greeted me warmly at the door, I found myself relaxing.

“I knew I could count on you,” she said happily, leading me into her living room. “Well, I owe you, big time.” Debbie glanced towards the kitchen, then quickly leaned over and whispered in my ear. “Don’t be put off when you see John. He showed up in a foam neck brace and said he’ll tell us all what happened.” She pulled away, then quickly returned to my ear. “I forgot to mention that he wears a toupee, so don’t stare.” She smiled and, in her sweet normal voice, said, “I’ll be back in a minute.” This should be interesting, I thought, I’ve never met anyone who wears a toupee.

She hurried off to the kitchen where the men had already begun preparing drinks. I sat down on the sofa and looked around. The brass, ceramics, paintings and furniture that Debbie had collected during her time in Taiwan never ceased to impress me, and as usual reminded me of how long it had been since I’d gone off to somewhere exciting. I did a fair amount of traveling for Excelsior, but the places I was sent to could hardly be considered exotic.

“Well, hello there,” I heard a deep voice call. I turned to see John Perry emerging from the kitchen, carrying two drinks. Ted and Debbie followed. Debbie winked at me.

Despite the medical brace around his neck, John was a dashing figure . . . tall, light brown hair, good-looking with a ruddy complexion and mischievous blue eyes. He was well dressed, too, in his tweed jacket and designer silk tie. He strode confidently across the living room. “Rum-and-coke for the lady,” he said, offering me the drink with an impish grin. Debbie was right, I thought. This man was already interesting to me...neck brace, toupee, and all.

“Thanks,” I said, taking the drink. I felt my cheeks flush as he looked me over. I was glad I’d decided to wear my red knit dress tonight. Everyone said red was my best color, and suddenly that seemed important.

Meanwhile, Debbie had set a tray of appetizers on the glass coffee table. John, I noticed, had already fixed a plate and was holding it out for me to take. I thanked him again.

“Debbie,” he said, “you didn’t tell me your friend was such a looker.”

My cheeks burned once more. John settled into a nearby chair, never taking his eyes off me. This was not going the way I had expected. Trying to exert some control, I blurted out, “Why don’t you tell me something about yourself?” And he did. He started out with an apology for the blue-foam neck brace and explained that a baggage cart loaded with heavy equipment had recently plowed into his neck and back while he stood waiting for a taxi at the Mexico City airport. “But it can’t stop an old Navy man,” he said. He launched into his military career and told me that after his last Vietnam tour in 1969, he’d been denied field duty. Because he hadn’t relished the notion of a desk job, retirement was the better choice. He’d been a captain in the Navy, but at retirement received a tombstone promotion to rear admiral.

“Tombstone?” I asked.

“That’s when an officer, at retirement, is honored by a raise of one rank. It depends, of course, on the officer’s service record. Obviously, it provides higher retirement pay.” He raised his glass.

“Guess you got that promotion because of the Congressional Medal of Honor, huh, John?” Ted asked.

I leaned forward. “You received the Medal of Honor?”

We were off and running. John talked about how the VC had swarmed over his unit’s position. They’d been completely outnumbered, casualties incredibly high. He was nearly killed trying to save several of his men. John’s hand slid to the side of his chest and rested there as he continued. “A fifty millimeter machine gun opened me up good.” He patted the spot on his side. “Real good. Right here,” he sighed. “Lost a lung, you know. Still carry the scar.”

We were all silent for a moment while John leaned across the table to fix himself a plate of appetizers.

“No disrespect intended,” I heard myself say, “but war is always horrible. I believe we had no business being in Vietnam.”

John smiled and began to lay out the usual arguments about the importance of fighting communism, but eventually admitted the war had taken its toll on him. “I still have nightmares about the kids I wasn’t able to save,” he said solemnly. He told us he had to shoot one of his own men who fell into a camouflaged, bamboo-stake-filled pit. Debbie gasped and I shuddered. “He begged me to shoot him,” John explained. “When you’re in the service, you go where duty calls and you do what you have to do.”

I looked away, not caring to hear any more war stories. That didn’t faze John, who seemed to relish talking about it. If I had only known then what I know now . . . that most servicemen don’t like to talk about their war experiences. But I didn’t. So, despite my disinterest in the topic, I found myself listening.

He said he’d been in three wars. He’d lied about his age in order to enlist during World War II, and, at sixteen, joined one of the first Navy SEAL units for underwater demolition. “I was a naval aviator in the Korean War. Got shot down once but landed in the water.” He smiled, remembering. “After two tours in the Blue Angels, I went to Vietnam and was given command of the Black Boats, small and swift. They went up the river into North Vietnam. It was dangerous duty. Very dangerous.”

It was clear he loved to talk about the military, about his experiences. “It’s in the blood,” he commented. “I’m tenth generation Navy. Did you know that, Ted?”

Before Ted could answer, John was already into the topic of a film from the 1940s, starring John Wayne. It was the story of John’s father and how he had started the Seabees.

“Because Dad was story consultant on the set,” John said, “I got to meet John Wayne. Matter of fact, the Duke and I got to be real good friends.”

After offering some inside gossip about the Duke, he joined Ted back in the kitchen to rustle up another round of drinks. Debbie immediately pumped me for my reaction to her guest. I conceded the man was certainly interesting. “But,” I cautioned her, “if you’re thinking what I think you’re thinking, forget it. He’s almost as old as my mother.”

“Maybe he is too old for you.” Debbie stood, announced that she was going into the kitchen to put on the finishing touches, and started out of the room. Over her shoulder she added, “Or maybe he’s not.”

“Not?”

“Too old for you. Maybe he’s not.”

Read Part 2 of the first chapter tomorrow. . . .


Friday, November 7, 2008

Survivor Story: One Woman's Dance with the Devil

by Barbara Bentley

I was thirty-five, divorced and not really looking for a man when Rear Admiral John Perry, twenty years my senior, swooshed into my life and swept me off my feet. He moved in almost immediately and for the next nine years we alternated between a normal life and periods of financial stress that almost drove me crazy.

Then John tried to kill me by ether
asphyxiation. Every detail is burned in memory. His right arm flung around my shoulders and pushed me into his chest. My eyes widened. An ether-soaked washrag propelled toward my nose and mouth. I was scared. Adrenaline surged through my body, and my survival instinct kicked into full gear as I jerked my head back and forth. My thoughts raced. Make a moving target. Ether can kill. Think fast. Don't open mouth. Don't let rag stay on face. Don't breathe or you won't leave this room alive.

I wiggled and twisted, struggling to get out of his grip, but I couldn't. Think, Barbara, think. Handicap bar on bathtub wall. Grab it! I held on to the bar with both hands and created enough leverage to partially extricate myself from his bear hug.

My left shoe came off. Fingers tightened around my left wrist.

I thrashed about as the rag neared my face once more.

Must get out. Get to door.

Desperate, I grabbed at the doorjamb with my free hand and pulled myself into the dressing area, right along with John.

Keep mouth shut. Move head back and forth, up and down. Don't stop. Oh my god, I'm gong to die in a hotel room in Virginia.

My right ankle twisted, and that shoe came off. My free hand poked at his eyes but couldn't quite make contact.

Somehow, I survived. . . . Only to be thrown unwillingly into the world of the criminal justice system. By the time I was battered about by the courts . . . the prison system . . . and the parole board . . . I realized that the name was aptly given. The criminal gets the justice and the victim is regarded as some minor part of the whole charade . . . and definitely an inconvenience once the trial is over. All focus is on the criminal. Even the victim’s assistance program failed me.

The one saving grace during this period was the homicide detective whom I credit with saving my life. He went beyond expectations and insisted on arresting John, even when his fellow officers told him he should have just let me go back to California. He knew if I had that I would have shortly been dead.

Five months after the attack—and a month after John’s conviction for first-degree attempted murder—I pondered why this had happened to me. Why would I, a seemingly intelligent woman, become trapped in a web of deceit that almost killed me? Then it dawned on me: I was to write a book to help others.

What I didn’t know at the time was that my story would not be finished for another four years. As a victim of California’s
no-fault divorce law (which was forcing me to pay alimony to the very man who was in jail for attempting to murder me), I would take on the Sacramento lawmakers and become a champion for victim’s rights. I wanted to change the law. And I did.

As I began my writing journey I used my organizational skills to record events and dates on separate index cards. I scoured old calendars, date books, photograph albums, and letters. I rummaged through the cardboard file boxes that contained the miscellaneous paperwork that I had accumulated from John’s home office when I had acted as the west coast investigator for the homicide detective in Arlington, Virginia. Fortunately, I had filed them chronologically.

More than once I would pause and shake my head in disgust. Bile would rise, along with my blood pressure.

Why would the police send out a patrol car on a domestic violence dispute when the hotel clerk called the police to report my husband has just tried to murder me?

Why would John get booked into family court and cause me panic when his bail was lowered to $2,500?

Why was it I who found out the FBI was investigating John for impersonating an admiral when the police couldn’t confirm his identity with fingerprints? That discovery at least got the bail raised back to $25,000 . . . but for attempted murder that still didn’t seem high enough.

Why would the judge give John a five-year sentence that allowed him to make parole in less than a year when he had been convicted of first-degree attempted murder? Why did I have to follow a round-about lead to confirm his parole?

Why did the victim’s advocate at the prison act like I was an inconvenience when I asked why I had not been notified?

Why was I not told when John exited the system? Oh wait . . . it’s because it’s the criminal justice system. I was just the victim. He had more rights than I.


Mind you, I’m not wallowing in victim’s pity. I pulled myself together not long after the murder attempt–I had to in order to have strength to testify against John. Then I moved forward and eventually beyond myself to help others. I wrote my book A DANCE WITH THE DEVIL: A TRUE STORY OF MARRIAGE TO A PSYCHOPATH and I now have the last laugh on my perpetrator. But my efforts dredged up old memories of how the criminal justice system had failed me. Fortunately, some laws have changed but the scales of justice still tip to the criminal’s side. It made me mad then. It makes me mad now.



Barbara Bentley is a victims' advocate in California, where she was directly responsible for the passage of Assembly Bill 16, which changed California divorce law. A member of STAND! Against Domestic Violence, she addresses women’s and victim’s rights organizations, and her story was featured on Lifetime’s "Final Justice." Visit Women in Crime Ink over the weekend for an exclusive peek at A DANCE WITH THE DEVIL. Chapter 1 will be posted here (in two parts, the first on Saturday). Find out more about Barbara and her book at http://www.adancewiththedevil.com/


Thursday, November 6, 2008

SUSAN MURPHY-MILANO ON "TRUE CRIMES" RADIO

This Saturday at 2:00 p.m. PST, listen to WCI's Susan Murphy-Milano on TRUE CRIMES, an online broadcast devoted to true crime.

"I am the daughter of a Chicago Violent Crimes Detective," Susan told TRUE CRIMES. "My father murdered my mother before taking his own life."

Susan found her parents' bodies.

"I will not rest until those who abuse and kill are held accountable."

And so Susan has turned tragedy into her life's work. As a nationally recognized women's advocate, she was instrumental in the passage of the Illinois Stalking Law and the Lautenberg Act. A voice for victims, Susan has championed the rights of battered women and children, in court cases and in coordinating exit strategies with safe houses and bodyguards.

The nonfiction author and violence expert has reached women far and wide, through publications such as Woman's Day, Family Circle, and U.S. News & World Report. Susan has also made appearances on Oprah, 20/20, American Justice, CNN, 48 Hours, and Nightline.

In spreading the word and her work through media appearances, Susan has received a flood of correspondence from wives of officers across the country—women with no place to turn for assistance, all because a husband or boyfriend was a respected law enforcement officer. There is no excuse for violence, Susan says, especially in a police officer's home.

Why aren't departments seeking a zero-tolerance policy on domestic violence committed by police officers? Is it too embarrassing? Family members rarely come forward to report these crimes and if they do, they are often victimized even more by their abusive officer spouse or boyfriend.

"He was going to kill me," said a Boston police officer's wife. "How can you let him keep his gun and stay on the street?"

"When a police department does not take action, we, the families of officers, feel powerless and worried about our own lives and the safety of their kids. All this does is further victimize us, when will it end?" (Wife of a New York State Trooper)

"You know the words on the side of police cars, 'We Serve And Protect,' let me tell you every time I see that I'm sick with grief. It doesn't apply to me. It should read, 'hey, we serve and protect our own'!" (Another woman married to an officer)

The women say that when they notified police, investigating officers were reluctant to pursue the cases. Evidence was mishandled. Some of the women were pressured by other officers or top brass to drop their complaints.

"I was treated like a criminal, I was trying to get some help here," said another.

The silence surrounding cops who abuse and murder their spouses has been deafening. Until Drew Peterson was finally thrown into the spotlight, with one wife dead and the other presumed killed, such cases rarely made the news. But just this week there was another shocking case in the headlines.

Who do you call when your husband, the police officer, is beating the hell out of you? You contact Susan Murphy-Milano. Listen to the live broadcast tomorrow on TRUE CRIMES with renowned author Burl Barer (pictured right) and attorney Don Woldman.

TRUE CRIMES

Links to listen: http://outlawcrime.com or http://www.mrcigar.com/live.asx

Saturday, November 8

2:00 p.m. PST

Also, you can tune in to Susan on Tuesday evenings for Justice Interrupted, the "Crime Investigation Radio Network," which she co-hosts with WCI's Stacy Dittrich and Robin Sax.