How A True Crime Writer Protects Herself From Scammers

by Cathy Scott

Wanna-be scammers sometimes jump out of the shadows to steal authors’ identities to pull off their dirty deeds. Case in point was my own recent encounter with a man who said he was developing the definitive biopic about Tupac Shakur.

That’s been done. Over and over. But no one’s quite hit the mark yet. So, I talked to Mr. Scam, who said he was a producer. The first red flag was his request that I do interviews for his documentary.

I’m used to being at the flip side of a reporter’s notebook, taking down interview notes and quotes. I’m also used to being on the lens side of the camera as the interviewee, especially when it comes to the Tupac story, because of my book, The Killing of Tupac Shakur, about the murder.

 What I’m not used to is being asked to do a producer’s work. They land the interviews, hire the video crew, nail down a studio and on-site locations for the interviews, and typically get on-air talent to conduct the interviews.

But scammer was eager. He didn’t stop calling. Or e-mailing. He wanted to get me immediately signed to a contract–for what, it wasn’t made clear. What did become clear was his burning desire to use my name as part of his project.

How to Spot a Scammer

Unlike other producers who have contacted me over the years, this one didn’t offer his background or even the name of his company. I learned that myself through a simple Internet search. A tap of the Google “send” button turned up a disturbing recent past. He’d been arrested and charged in a multi-million-dollar Ponzi scheme (think Madoff) bilking people and companies out of millions for investments in projects and land deals as illusory as the fabled swampland in Florida.

My scammer’s new con was the promise of a documentary that would never be made using an author’s name to lend it credibility. The author being offered the starring role in that scam was me. In the meantime, my personal predator had already been living large on the backs of others running an old-fashioned con.

FBI to Author: 'He’s Desperate – Give Him Wide Berth'

An FBI special agent, when reached about the case, said the poser was desperate. He’d lost his house and had run out of cash. He was fund-raising his own support. The fed’s advice? “Stay away. And don’t get him angry. You don’t want to be in a confrontation with this guy.”

As business women, we all have to watch for red lights, green lights, and red flags. Not everybody is good at recognizing them. I’m a skeptic at heart. I’ve been in the business of crime news too long not to be. And it’s not just little fish that get fried. Even the big kids occasionally get scammed. Witness the recent porn site ad scam that AT&T and Verizon fell for.

Here’s how to protect yourself from scammers. Recognize the red flag, do your research, and consult with law enforcement.

For Mr. Producer, I have some very public advice: Quit e-mailing, quit texting, quit calling. I know who you are and what you’re trying to pull. Don’t use my name to plan your crime.

(Reprinted with permission from ForbesWoman).

Tweet

Made Off With Plenty

by Donna Pendergast

Bernie Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison yesterday. The appropriately named Madoff pled guilty on March 12th to eleven felony counts including mail fraud, wire fraud, perjury, money laundering, securities fraud, theft from an employee benefit fund and false filings with the Securities Exchange Commission for running a Ponzi scheme valued at over fifty billion dollars.

U.S. District Judge Denny Chin referred to Madoff''s crimes as "extraordinary evil" at sentencing stating that "this type of manipulation is not just a bloodless crime that takes place on paper but one instead that takes a staggering toll."

Although many of the victims present in the courtroom were pleased with the sentence, they all understand that a a century and a half of largely symbolic punishment will do little to help the legions of persons that were financially wiped out by the fraud of staggering proportions perpetrated on victims who trusted Madoff with their money, their future and their retirement dreams

Now 71 years old, Madoff will spend the rest of his days on earth in a cell that is a far cry from the opulent residences that he shared with his wife and family. Maybe a few months of that kind of existence will convince Madoff that his heinous acts are more than "an error of judgement", a "problem" or a "tragic mistake" which were the terms that he used at sentencing to refer to his elaborate financial ruse

But then again probably not

The victims, who at sentencing referred to Madoff as a "monster" and a "psychopath" were right on base. Working as a prosecutor for over two decades I have come across my share of clinical psychopaths over the years. Although the psychopaths that I normally deal with commit crimes of a violent nature, they share plenty in common with Bernie Madoff. Lying, manipulation, coldness and lack of empathy are the hallmarks of a psychopath, a person who exploits relationships and persons with abandon and without remorse. Bernie Madoff certainly fits the bill on all points.

For those who wonder whether Madoff ever thinks of the persons that he has ruined, the answer is complex. He thinks about them he doesn't care in a way that a normal person can relate to. He cares that he got caught. He cares that his luxurious life has been taken away but he won't lay awake at night thinking about the daily struggles that his victims will have to endure.

His courtroom statements were very telling about what is important in the mind of Bernie Madoff. How can one stand in a courtroom looking in the eyes of persons who have been ruined by your actions, and refer to your misdeeds as an "error of judgement?" Those words alone pretty much say it all. The man understands but fails to care that he has condemned scores of persons to a life of poverty and struggle. His later feeble attempts at apology were overshadowed by the references to his "problem" and his "tragic mistake," the same tragic mistake that he kept making over and over while in the process imprisoning his victims in their own version of hell.

Judge Chin noted at sentencing that not a single letter had attested to Madoff''s good deeds or charitable activities further commenting that the silence was telling.

The silence is telling? The silence is deafening and yet says it all.


Statements made in this post are my own and are not intended to reflect the views, opinion or position of the Michigan Attorney General or the Michigan Department of Attorney General.

Tweet

Group Think

by Lucy Puryear, M.D.

It is no longer 1984, but George Orwell was on to something when he penned his classic and prescient novel. Published in 1949, Orwell wrote of an eerie world where individualism was rejected and universal group adherence was mandated. Although the fear that 1984 would resemble "1984" the novel did not come true, many of his concepts are relevant to our culture today.

I would like to talk about group behavior and crime. In 1979, social psychologist Irving Janis coined the phrase "groupthink." He defined groupthink as "a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action."

I am proposing that groupthink contributed to the financial crisis that we are facing today and allowed white collar criminals like Bernie Madoff and Sir Allen Stanford (pictured left) to swindle large numbers of intelligent investors. Those of us on the sidelines can't imagine how so many were taken in by unrealistic promises of over-the-top financial returns. But I'm certain if I saw the fortunes many of my friends were making I would want to join the party. When Madoff's funds consistently beat the market while others didn't, common sense would demand questions be asked. But no one wants to tell the Emperor he's naked, especially if they're serving caviar and champagne at the party.

It takes a charismatic, talented individual to conceive of and pull off a massive fraud on the scale of Stanford's and Madoff's. But without individuals following, the Ponzi scheme never would have worked. It was only when there were no more investors left with money that the plan fell apart. But we weren't immune to the bandwagon.

The stock market is a prime example of groupthink. We think the economy is doing well and we invest as we see stock prices rising. We think the economy is doing a nosedive and we panic, pulling our money out and stopping our spending. None of really knows what the economy will or won't do, but the group dynamic says we're in really bad shape here whether or not we personally are.

The dominant message from the politicians is restoring consumer confidence. Meaning, if we believe things will get better, we will reinvest and re-spend and the stock market will go up. The stock market often has less to do with real data and more about how people feel. And right now we're all feeling bad.

It is not just financial malfeasance that is made possible by groupthink. Large crimes against

humanity require people to function with a singular group mentality rather than with individual judgement. Why did so many Germans, otherwise good people, tolerate the Holocaust and the torture and slaughter of millions? How is it possible that Jim Jones in Ghana convinced hundreds to drink purple Kool-Aid? David Koresh? Marshall Applewhite (shown right)? All of these men became cult leaders, convincing numbers of usually bright, well-meaning people to follow them, even to their deaths.

Groupthink is frightening and we are all susceptible to it. It takes a unique individual to stand up to the mob and risk being ridiculed, excluded, or worse. Remember what it was like to be a teenage girl, listening to others make fun of your best friend, but deciding to go along so that you could be a part of the cool crowd and not be ostracized from the clique? As the examples above prove, people will choose death over losing their place in the group and being left behind. Most frightening of all, as we become more and more enveloped by groupthink, we begin to think of those thoughts and ideas as our own and lose our ability to think for ourselves.

People are not responsible for the choices criminals make, but in certain situations it takes our cooperation (unconscious though it may be) to become victims. Those charismatic, narcissistic, antisocial individuals know a lot about groupthink, and how to use it to their advantage.

Tweet